| Word Document PDF Document |
ALJ/KAJ/tcg DRAFT 1
5/2/02
Agenda ID #446
Decision DRAFT DECISION OF ALJ JONES (Mailed 4/2/2002)
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Application of Roseville Telephone Company (U 1015 C) to Review Extended Area Service Compensation and Establish Replacement Revenue Funding. |
Application 99-08-043 (Filed August 20, 1999) |
OPINION DENYING PETITION TO MODIFY
In this decision we deny Roseville Telephone Company's (Roseville) Petition to Modify Decision (D.) 00-11-039 and uphold our determination in D.00-11-039 that the California High Cost Fund-B (CHCF-B) is not an appropriate permanent source of funding to replace the $11.5 million Extended Area Service (EAS) payment Roseville previously received from Pacific Bell Telephone Company (Pacific).