Word Document PDF Document

ALJ/KAJ/tcg * DRAFT H-2

Decision

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Rulemaking on the Commission's Own Motion to Govern Open Access to Bottleneck Services and Establish a Framework for Network Architecture Development of Dominant Carrier Networks.

Rulemaking 93-04-003

(Filed April 7, 1993)

Investigation on the Commission's Own Motion into Open Access and Network Architecture Development of Dominant Carrier Networks.

Investigation 93-04-002

(Filed April 7 1993)

(Permanent Line Sharing

Phase)

INTERIM OPINION ESTABLISHING PERMANENT RATES FOR THE

HIGH-FREQUENCY PORTION OF THE LOOP

(See Appendix A for a List of Appearances)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTERIM OPINION ESTABLISHING PERMANENT RATE FOR THE
HIGH-FREQUENCY PORTION OF THE LOOP.............................................................1

Findings of Fact .......................................................................................................66

Conclusions of Law...................................................................................................70

INTERIM ORDER....................................................................................................71

Appendix A - List of Appearances

INTERIM OPINION ESTABLISHING PERMANENT RATES FOR THE

HIGH-FREQUENCY PORTION OF THE LOOP

1. Summary

This decision adopts permanent Unbundled Network Element (UNE) rates for the High-Frequency Portion of the Loop (HFPL)1 for both Pacific Bell Telephone Company (Pacific) and Verizon California Inc. (Verizon). The rate for Pacific is $2.48 per loop per month, and for Verizon, $3.00. The methodology adopted allows the rate for the HFPL to be modified, based on changes in adopted loop rates.

The Interim Line Sharing (ILS) decision determined that there should be a true-up, from the interim rates adopted in the ILS proceeding, and the final rates adopted in this Permanent Line Sharing (PLS) Phase. Therefore, Pacific is required to refund the difference between the $5.85 monthly recurring rate adopted in the ILS proceeding, and the $2.48 (or deaveraged loop rates) adopted in this decision to the Competitive Local Exchange Carrier (CLEC) which purchased each loop. Since this decision retains the $3.00 rate adopted for Verizon in the Interim phase, no true-up is required for Verizon.

We find that establishing a separate rate for the HFPL allows Pacific and Verizon to over-recover their loop costs, since they are currently recovering the full cost of the loop-including the HFPL portion-through rates for their existing tariffed services. Pacific and Verizon will be required to return the balances in their memoranda accounts and future HFPL revenues to ratepayers using Pacific's Rule 33 and Verizon's A-38 surcharge/surcredit mechanisms.

1 The High Frequency Portion of the Loop is that portion used to carry high bandwidth services such as Digital Subscriber Line service (DSL). This is in contrast to the low frequency portion of the loop used to carry voice grade services.

Top Of PageNext PageGo To First Page