Word Document |
COM/LYN/tah/epg* ALTERNATE DRAFT Agenda ID 1747
Ratesetting
H-6a 2/13/03
Decision ALTERNATE PROPOSED DECISION OF COMMISSIONER LYNCH (Mailed 1/30/03)
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Application of Clear World Communications Corporation for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity To Operate as a Provider of Resold Local Exchange Telecommunications Service Within the State of California. |
Application 01-09-040 (Filed September 25, 2001) |
David A. Simpson, and Dwight Donovan,
Attorneys at Law, for Clear World
Communications Corporation, applicant.
Chris Witteman, Attorney at Law, for the
Consumer Protection & Safety Division (CPSD),
interested party.
OPINION DENYING APPLICATION
AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page
OPINION DENYING APPLICATION AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 22
III. Opposition of the Commission's Consumer
Protection and Safety Division (CPSD) 22
IV. Background of Worldwide, Clear World and the Mancusos 33
Worldwide-Agreement with WTS 99
Worldwide-False Statement 1111
Worldwide-Concealment of True Address 1212
Worldwide-Concealment of the Role of Christopher Mancuso 1313
Worldwide-Failure to Comply with D.02-06-045 1414
Clear World-Altered Document 2222
Clear World-Aiding Unlicensed Sale of Telephone
Services by Worldwide 2323
Clear World-Sale of Telephone Service Without a CPCN 2424
Clear World-Adequacy of Financial Records 2525
VII. Categorization and Need for Hearings 3030
OPINION DENYING APPLICATION
AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Clear World Communications Corporation (Clear World) seeks a certificate of public convenience and necessity (CPCN) under Pub. Util. Code § 1001 for authority to resell local exchange telecommunications services as a competitive local carrier. By this decision, we deny the requested authority because Clear World is not fit to provide such services. In addition, we prohibit Christopher Mancuso from any involvement with any utility subject to our jurisdiction, including Clear World, and order Clear World to show cause why it should not be fined for slamming, and have its CPCN to resell interexchange services revoked.