Word Document PDF Document |
STATE OF CALIFORNIA GRAY DAVIS, Governor
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
505 VAN NESS AVENUE
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3298
March 20, 2003 Agenda ID #1969
TO: PARTIES OF RECORD IN APPLICATION 01-09-004
This is the proposed decision of Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Barnett, previously designated as the principal hearing officer in this proceeding. It will not appear on the Commission's agenda for at least 30 days after the date it is mailed. This matter was categorized as ratesetting and is subject to Pub. Util. Code ยง 1701.3(c). Pursuant to Resolution ALJ-180 a Ratesetting Deliberative Meeting to consider this matter may be held upon the request of any Commissioner. If that occurs, the Commission will prepare and mail an agenda for the Ratesetting Deliberative Meeting 10 days before hand, and will advise the parties of this fact, and of the related ex parte communications prohibition period.
The Commission may act at the regular meeting, or it may postpone action until later. If action is postponed, the Commission will announce whether and when there will be a further prohibition on communications.
When the Commission acts on the proposed decision, it may adopt all or part of it as written, amend or modify it, or set it aside and prepare its own decision. Only when the Commission acts does the decision become binding on the parties.
Parties to the proceeding may file comments on the proposed decision as provided in Article 19 of the Commission's "Rules of Practice and Procedure." These rules are accessible on the Commission's website at http://www.cpuc.ca.gov. Pursuant to Rule 77.3 opening comments shall not exceed 15 pages. Finally, comments must be served separately on the ALJ and the assigned Commissioner, and for that purpose I suggest hand delivery, overnight mail, or other expeditious method of service.
/s/ ANGELA K. MINKIN
Angela K. Minkin, Chief
Administrative Law Judge
ANG:tcg
ALJ/RAB/tcg DRAFT Agenda ID #1969
Ratesetting
Decision PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ BARNETT (Mailed 3/20/2003)
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Application of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338-E) to Review and Recover Transition Cost Balancing Account Entries from July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2001, and Various Generation-Related Memorandum Account Entries. |
Application 01-09-004 (Filed September 4, 2001) |
Robert B. Keeler and David R. Hinman, Attorneys at Law, for Southern California Edison Company, applicant.
Jason Reiger, Attorney at Law, for Office of Ratepayer Advocates.
This decision permits Southern California Edison Company (SCE) to recover approximately $20,000,000 in costs accruing prior to August 31, 2001, in four accounts. It finds that the release of claims by SCE in the Settlement Agreement between SCE and this Commission did not release the claims which are the subject of this decision.