4. Need for Expedited Consideration

Rule 77.7(f)(9) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure provides in relevant part that:

"...the Commission may reduce or waive the period for public review and comment under this rule...for a decision where the Commission determines, on the motion of a party or on its own motion, that public necessity requires reduction or waiver of the 30-day period for public review and comment. For purposes of this subsection, "public necessity" refers to circumstances in which the public interest in the Commission adopting a decision before expiration of the 30-day review and comment period clearly outweighs the public interest in having the full 30-day period for review and comment. "Public necessity" includes, without limitation, circumstances where failure to adopt a decision before expiration of the 30-day review and comment period...would cause significant harm to public health or welfare. When acting pursuant to this subsection, the Commission will provide such reduced period for public review and comment as is consistent with the public necessity requiring reduction or waiver."

We balance the public interest in quickly modifying the DBP against the public interest in having a full 30-day comment cycle on the proposed modification. We conclude that the former outweighs the latter. The DBP will protect public health, safety and welfare in Summer 2002 by promoting system reliability. Any delay in implementing a revised DBP jeopardizes public health, safety and welfare by increasing the risk of customers experiencing a less reliable system, including the potential of rotating outages. We seek valuable public review of, and comment on, the proposed change, and find that a reduced period balances the need for that input with the need for timely action.