5 Need for Expedited Consideration

Rule 77.7(f)(9) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure provides in relevant part that:

"...the Commission may reduce or waive the period for public review and comment under this rule...for a decision where the Commission determines, on the motion of a party or on its own motion, that public necessity requires reduction or waiver of the 30-day period for public review and comment. For purposes of this subsection, "public necessity" refers to circumstances in which the public interest in the Commission adopting a decision before expiration of the 30-day review and comment period clearly outweighs the public interest in having the full 30-day period for review and comment. "Public necessity" includes, without limitation, circumstances where failure to adopt a decision before expiration of the 30-day review and comment period...would cause significant harm to public health or welfare. When acting pursuant to this subsection, the Commission will provide such reduced period for public review and comment as is consistent with the public necessity requiring reduction or waiver."

SDG&E asks that the Commission act on its petition as an emergency. (Emergency Petition for Modification, page 1, footnote 1.)

We balance the public interest in quickly amending D.01-04-006 to adopt the RBRP against the public interest in having a full 30-day comment cycle on the proposed amendment. We conclude that the former outweighs the latter. We agree with SDG&E that this program, as modified, has merit, and time is short before Summer 2001 begins. Delay in adopting the RBRP jeopardizes public health and safety by increasing exposure to rolling blackouts. We seek valuable public review and comment of our proposed change, and find that a reduced period balances the need for that input with the need for timely action before Summer 2001.