As we have held in numerous complaint cases, the complainants bear the burden of proving each alleged violation of a statute or Commission rule or order.3 Furthermore, as stated in Evidence Code Section 115 this burden requires "proof by a preponderance of the evidence"; i.e., the complainants must present a sufficient amount of evidence in support of their claim or claims to reasonably conclude that it outweighs any conflicting evidence presented by the defendant.
3 ( See Calif. Portland Cement Co. v. So. Pac. Co. (1931) 35 Cal.RRC 904; City of Firebaugh v. So. Pac. Trans. Co.(1974) 77CPUC 636; Nicholson v. Citizens Util. Co. (1986) 21 CPUC2d 524; BBD Trans. Co. v. Pac. Southcoast Freight Bureau(1974) 76 CPUC 485, 508; Long Beach v. Unocal Pipeline Co. (1993) 52 CPUC2d 317)