10. Comments on the Alternate Proposed Decision

The proposed decision of the assigned Commissioner and the alternate proposed decision of the ALJ in this matter was mailed to the parties in accordance with Pub. Util. Code § 311, and comments were allowed pursuant to Rule 14.3. Comments were filed on August 31, 2009, by Cal Fire, a coalition of communications providers,⁶⁸ CPSD, DisabRA, DRA, the Alliance, the County of San Diego, SDG&E, the School Districts, the Water Districts, and UCAN. Reply comments were filed on September 8, 2009, by Cal Fire, a coalition of communications providers, CPSD, DisabRA, DRA, the Alliance, and the County of San Diego, SDG&E, the School Districts, and the Water Districts. These comments and reply comments are reflected, as appropriate, in today's decision.

⁶⁸ The coalition of communications providers consist of CCTA, AT&T and affiliates, CoxCom, Inc., Cox California Telcom, L.L.C., dba Cox Communications, CTIA-The Wireless Association, and Time Warner Cable.