IV. STAFF'S ANALYSIS OF CRAMMING COMPLAINTS AGAINST AMERICATEL

A. Cramming Complaint Data From Americatel

As part of its investigation, Staff requested from Americatel data related to customer inquiries or complaints regarding unauthorized services/charges. On February 23, 2009, Americatel provided the total number of complaints received in 2008 (see Table 3).35

Table 3. Number of California Complaints

Alleging Unauthorized Charges by Americatel

(Jan 2008-Dec 2008)

Month

Number of Complaints

Jan-08

108

Feb-08

62

Mar-08

71

Apr-08

100

May-08

566

Jun-08

2,721

Jul-08

6,341

Aug-08

5,693

Sep-08

882

Oct-08

922

Nov-08

559

Dec-08

524

Total

18,549

Source: Americatel Data Response Dated April 3, 2009 36


Source:
Americatel Data Response Dated February 23, 2009

Table 3 shows that complaints began to increase beginning May 2008 (a nearly five-fold increase from the month before) and peaked at 6,341 complaints in July 2008. The total number of complaints in 2008 of 18,549 significantly rose by more than 10 times from 1,681 in the prior year. The chart above illustrates the staggering year over year comparison.

B. Cramming Complaints Data From CAB

Based on the CAB database, (as shown on Table 4 below), the complaints received by CAB for Americatel total 512 in 2008. Of the 512 complaints, 262 (51%) were categorized as cramming complaints and 94 (18%) were categorized as slamming complaints. As depicted by the complaint data from Americatel, complaints received by CAB also significantly grew in 2008 (from 117 complaints in 2007 to 512 in 2008).

Table 4. Number of Consumer Complaints

Against Americatel Based on Data from CAB

(Jan 2008-Dec 2008)

Month

Source: CPUC CAB Database as of March 16, & 17, 2009 and CIMS Database as of July 6, 2009 (Attachment M-2)

Number of Complaints

Jan-08

6

Feb-08

9

Mar-08

10

Apr-08

8

May-08

12

Jun-08

77

Jul-08

220

Aug-08

90

Sep-08

26

Oct-08

21

Nov-08

13

Dec-08

20

Total

512

Source: CAB Database as of April 6, 2009 37

C. Complaints with CAB Show that Most Consumers Alleged Cramming, Continuous Billing Even After Cancellation Was Requested and Inadequate Service Provision

Staff reviewed the complaint details recorded in the CAB database and noted that consumers complained about unauthorized charges by Americatel or cramming; continuous billing post cancellation; and/or, inadequate/poor customer service. Below are examples of consumer complaints in the CAB database:

D. Declarations From Complainants Show Americatel Crammed Them

35 Attachment E-3

36 Printout of Excel Worksheet from February 23, 2009 Americatel Data Response (Attachment E-3) and April 3, 2009 Americatel Data Response (Attachment F-1)

37 Printout from CAB listing 512 complaints (Attachment M-1)

38 Attachment L

Previous PageTop Of PageNext PageGo To First Page