The EIS evaluated six project alternatives:
· Alternative 1, which is the Desert Sunlight Solar Farm project as proposed by the project proponent, and includes components designated as Solar Farm Layout B, Gen-Tie Line GT-A-1, Red Bluff Substation A and Access Road 2;
· Alternative 2, which is an alternative project configuration that would include Solar Farm Layout B, Gen-Tie Line GT-B-2, and Red Bluff Substation B;
· Alternative 3, which is an alternative configuration that would include Solar Farm Layout C, Gen-Tie Line GT-A-2, Red Bluff Substation A and Access Road 1;
· Alternative 4, which is a no-action alternative under which the project would not be approved;
· Alternative 5, which is a no-project alternative under which the project would not be approved and future large-scale solar energy development would not be allowed; and
· Alternative 6, which is a no-project alternative under which the project would not be approved and future large-scale solar energy development would be allowed.
Alternatives 1, 2 and 3 represent only three of the seven possible combinations of the project components (i.e., Solar Farm Layout, Gen-Tie Line, Red Bluff Substation and Access Road). The Commission's Energy Division therefore also considered the remaining four combinations, by analyzing and comparing the following component alternatives; this analysis is contained in Appendix C to the EIS:
· Red Bluff Substation:
o Substation A (eastern) and Access Road 1,
o Substation A (eastern) and Access Road 2, and
o Substation B (western).
· Gen-Tie Line:
o GT-A-1 (Kaiser Road to Desert Center, then east -- 12.2 miles),
o GT-A-2 (SCE right of way to Substation A -- 9.5 miles), and
o GT-B-2 (Kaiser Road to Desert Center, then west - 10 miles).
· Solar Farm Layout:
o Layout B (3912 acres)
o Layout C (3045 acres)