AT&T Comments/Commission Responses

1. Add to proposed Rule 77.7(f) a provision to reduce or waive the review and comment period for any resolution relating to an advice letter filed by a nondominant interexchange carrier or competitive local exchange service provider. (Reply Comments, p. 2.)

Response: Reject. A blanket exemption for an entire utility industry or major industry segment appears contrary to the intent of SB 779.

2. Oppose Greenlining's proposal to require that the Commission publish at its Internet site any draft resolution responding to an advice letter at least 45 days before voting on the resolution. (Reply Comments, pp. 2-3.)

Response: Agree (no change necessary). See Response to Greenlining Comment #2.

3. Support Joint Energy Utilities' proposal to limit the comment process to parties rather than interested persons. (Reply Comments, p. 3.)

Response: Reject. See Response to Joint Energy Utilities Comment #4.

4. Support commenters proposing to allow reply comments on draft resolutions. (Reply Comments, p. 3.)

Response: Agree. See Response to ORA Comment #1.

5. Support requiring Docket Office to administer the filing of comments on draft resolutions. (Reply Comments, p. 3.)

Response: Reject. See Response to Roseville Comment #3.