SDG&E seeks authority to delete Special Condition 15. This special condition permits the utility at its discretion to allow customers to take service on AL-TOU-CP and at the end of 12 months and be offered the difference between what they would have been billed on AL-TOU. SDG&E has never employed, nor does it intend to employ this provision.
Special Condition 19 should be deleted as the provision applies to situations that no longer exist.
Special Condition 9 should have an additional sentence to make it consistent with other tariffs. The proposed additional language is: "Customer shall provide for the installation of a meter(s) that registers the net output of any electric generator on customer's property." (See the Direct Testimony of Mohamed Derbas, pages 11-12, beginning at line 18):
Other Parties
No other party commented on SDG&E's proposal.
Settlement Agreement
No party objects to SDG&E's proposal to clean up the language in Schedule AL-TOU-CP of special conditions 15, 19 and 9 as set forth above and this language should be adopted.
e. Maximum Demand Definition:
SDG&E Proposal
SDG&E proposes to tighten the definition of Maximum Demand in Rule 1 so that it is clear that the customers load placed on the system is the basis for determination of demand, without credit for power production where that occurs (MAD-11, lines 6 etc).
WCP Position
Objects to the proposed change (GAC 2, lines 8-11).
Settlement Agreement
The Rule 1 language defining Maximum Demand should be modified to add the following sentence: "Other than as provided in Special Condition [refer to special condition added under section 8.b. of this Settlement Agreement] of Schedule AL-TOU, where the customer delivers power to the Utilities system during any fifteen-minute period those deliveries shall not be credited against the power received by the customer for determination of Maximum Demand."
II. RESERVATIONS
The Settlement Agreement represents a negotiated compromise among the Settlement Parties on several matters. The Settlement Parties intend that the Settlement Agreement be treated as an entire package and not as a group of separate agreements on individual issues. Accordingly, the Settlement Parties respectfully request that the Commission approve the Settlement Agreement it its entirety and without modification.
Agreed to by the undersigned parties on the date(s) indicated below.
|
_________/s/______________Date______ Vicki L. Thompson Attorney for San Diego Gas & Electric Company |
_________/s/____________Date_________ Gregory Heiden Attorney for Office of Ratepayer Advocates |
|
______/s/___________ Date ______________ Ronald Liebert Associate Counsel for California Farm Bureau Federation |
________/s/____________Date__________ Beth C. Tenney Attorney for California City-County Street Light Association |
|
_____/s/____________ Date ______________ Brian T. Cragg Attorney for West Coast Power |
________/s/_________ Date____________ Douglas K. Kerner Attorney for Duke Energy North America |
