State law clearly requires utilities to serve their customers, and a threatened bankruptcy filing or threat of insolvency does not change that obligation. Similarly, the financial distress of one utility cannot be used as an excuse by another utility to avoid its obligation to serve. As we stated in D.01-01-018, we have a duty to assure that the utilities are able to continue to procure and deliver power for their customers. This duty applies even if the utilities under our jurisdiction have filed for bankruptcy or are on the brink of petitioning for such relief. Our basic obligation under the Public Utilities Act is to assure the people of California adequate service at reasonable rates. Section 4513 provides, in relevant part:
All charges demanded or received by any public utility, or by any two or more public utilities, for any product or commodity furnished or to be furnished or any service rendered or to be rendered shall be just and reasonable. Every unjust or unreasonable charge demanded or received for such product or commodity or service is unlawful. Every public utility shall furnish and maintain such adequate, efficient, just and reasonable service, instrumentalities, equipment and facilities as are necessary to promote the safety, health, comfort and convenience of its patrons, employees, and the public.
We therefore issue this decision to affirm that PG&E and Edison must continue to provide reliable, safe, and adequate service to all Californians at just and reasonable rates, including continuing to enter into and maintain any current and future low-cost contracts to procure power. Our actions are consistent with the Legislature's intent, as stated in §§ 330(g), 330(h) and 391(a), part of Assembly Bill (AB) 1890 (Stats. 1996, Ch. 854), which provide in relevant part:
330(g): Reliable electric service of utmost importance to the safety, health, and welfare of the state's citizenry and economy.
330(h): It is important that sufficient supplies of electric generation will be available to maintain the reliable service to the citizens and business of the state.
391(a): Electricity is essential to the health, safety, and economic well-being of all California consumers.
In addition, §§ 761-788 give the Commission broad authority to issue orders controlling the equipment, practices and facilities of regulated utilities. For example, § 761 gives the Commission authority to order the "service, or methods to be observed, [or] furnished" by California Utilities. Section 761 also provides that utilities must furnish their commodities, or render their services according to the rules and orders of the Commission, so long as a customer makes "proper demand and tender of rates."
In relevant part, § 762 requires that:
Whenever the commission, after a hearing, finds that additions, extensions, repairs, or improvements to, or changes in, the existing plant, equipment, apparatus, facilities, or other physical property of any public utility or of any two or more public utilities ought reasonably to be made, or that new structures should be erected, to promote the security or convenience of its employees or the public, or in any other way to secure adequate service or facilities, the commission shall make and serve an order directing that such additions, extensions, repairs, improvements, or changes be made or such structures be erected in the manner and within the time specified in the order.
Furthermore, § 768 provides, in relevant part:
The commission may, after a hearing, require every public utility to construct, maintain, and operate its line, plant, system, equipment, apparatus, tracks, and premises in a manner so as to promote and safeguard the health and safety of its employees, passengers, customers, and the public.
Section 770 provides, in relevant part:
The commission may, after a hearing:
Ascertain and fix just and reasonable standards, classifications, regulations, practices, measurements, or service to be furnished, imposed, observed, and followed by all electrical, gas, water, and heat corporations.
Section 701 gives the Commission power to undertake all necessary actions to properly regulate and supervise California utilities. In Consumers Lobby Against Monopolies v. Public Utilities Commission (1979) 25 Cal.3d 891, 905, the California Supreme Court declared:
The commission is a state agency of constitutional origin with far-reaching duties, functions and powers. (Cal. Const., Art. XII §§ 1-6.) The Constitution confers broad authority on the commission to regulate utilities, including the power to fix rtes, establish rules, hold various types of hearings, award reparation, and establish its own procedures (Id., §§ 2, 4, 6.) ...
Pursuant to this grant of power, the Legislature enacted Public Utilities Code section 701, conferring on the commission expansive authority to `do all things, whether specifically designated in [the Public Utilities Act] or addition thereto, which are necessary and convenient' in the supervision and regulation of every public utility in California. (Italics added.) the commission's authority has been liberally construed. (Consumers Lobby Against Monopolies at 905.)
The California Supreme Court has further found that "the commission often exercises equitable jurisdiction as an incident to its express duties and authority. For example, the commission may issue injunctions in aid of jurisdiction specifically conferred upon it." (Id. at 907.)
Therefore, under our plenary powers and until this crisis is resolved, we intend to closely monitor and supervise the actions and expenditures of the investor-owned utilities under our regulation to ensure that service is provided. While we are dismayed that the energy crisis has escalated to the point that such tight control by the State is required, we intend to exercise the required control. We recognize that hearings are required and will provide for these, as we discuss below. Today we issue a temporary restraining order in order to avoid irreparable harm to public health and safety, to maintain the status quo, and to ensure that PG&E and Edison continue to schedule generation through the ISO to serve all customers with adequate, reliable service, consistent with their obligation to serve.
A TRO serves the purpose of preventing the actions of a party from causing irreparable harm to another party, pending a hearing on the need for a preliminary injunction. We are issuing this TRO on our motion and on an ex parte basis because we are convinced that if adequate service were not maintained, great or irreparable harm would result before the matter could proceed to a hearing. A TRO has the same force and effect as a preliminary injunction and remains in effect until an order can be issued granting or denying a preliminary injunction.
We therefore order PG&E and Edison to appear at an evidentiary hearing scheduled for January 29, 2001 at 10:00 a.m. to show cause as to why a preliminary injunction should not be issued.
We expect the utilities to fully comply with our orders. We have previously stated that nothing in AB 1890 relieves the existing utilities of their obligation to serve all customers in their service territories under their respective tariffs (D.97-09-047, mimeo. at p. 44.). In PG&E's holding company decision, D.98-04-068, the Commission specifically found that: "The capital requirements of PG&E, as determined to be necessary and prudent to meet the obligation to serve or to operate the utility in a prudent and efficient manner, shall be given first priority by PG&E Corporation's Board of Directors." (Id., at 98.) The Commissions' holding company decision clearly affirms the continuing obligation to serve.
3 All statutory references are to the Public Utilities Code, unless otherwise noted.