We will adopt a project cost cap based on the record developed in this case. We recognize that detailed engineering estimates have not been completed for the routes we select, so there is some uncertainty associated with the firmness of the cost cap we adopt today. However, we believe that the cost cap contains sufficient contingency factors in the estimating procedure to make the estimates of a sufficient level of reliability that we can adopt a cost cap. We have relied on PG&E's construction cost estimates, which were based on detailed engineering estimates for the project through difficult terrain (with minor adjustments for routing through flatter terrain), we have relied on PG&E's land cost estimates using a fee interest valuation, rather than an easement interest, and we have included significant contingency factors for each of these project cost areas. We have no reason to believe that PG&E cannot complete its project within the cost cap we adopt today.
If, upon completion of the final, detailed engineering design-based construction estimates for the alternatives selected, PG&E concludes that the costs will be materially (i.e., one percent or more) lower than the cost cap we adopt, PG&E shall submit with the estimate an explanation of why we should not revise the cost cap downward to reflect the new estimate. If the final estimate exceeds the cost cap we have adopted, then PG&E is free to exercise its rights to seek an increase in the cost cap pursuant to Pub. Util. Code § 1005.5(b). However, the cost cap will not automatically adjust upward even if the final, detailed costs exceed the cost cap.
We authorize a total project cost cap of $118,359,015 for the adopted Tri Valley 2002 Capacity Increase Project as reflected in Table 4.
Project Cost Cap
Adopted Routing Alternatives
Dublin Area Project - |
North Livermore Area Project - | ||||||||
Pleasanton Area Project - S2A/S2 |
PG&E Proposed +P2/P3 |
Substation/Feeder Costs Only | |||||||
Transmission Line Construction |
$ 32,338,856 |
Transmission Line Construction |
$ 27,716,411 |
Substation Engineering and Construction |
$ 6,599,735 | ||||
Overhead |
$ - |
Overhead |
$ 4,819,144 |
|
| ||||
Underground |
$ 32,338,856 |
Underground |
$ 22,897,267 |
Distribution Feeders |
$ 3,403,000 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Land Costs |
$ 6,350,139 |
Land Costs |
$ 2,664,484 |
North Livermore Area Subtotal |
$ 10,002,735 | ||||
|
|
|
|
||||||
Transition Station(s) |
$ 1,982,885 |
Transition Stations |
$ 3,965,770 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||
Substation Engineering and Construction |
$ 5,192,734 |
Substation Engineering and Construction |
$ 7,654,000 |
Costs Independent of Route Selected | |||||
|
|
|
|
||||||
Distribution Feeders |
$ 4,847,000 |
Distribution Feeders |
$ 4,885,000 |
Project Planning and Certification Costs |
$ 10,332,000 | ||||
|
|
|
|
||||||
Remote Terminal Protection Upgrades |
$ 427,000 |
Dublin Area Subtotal |
$ 46,885,666 |
||||||
|
|
||||||||
Pleasanton Area Subtotal |
$ 51,138,614 |
||||||||
Project Cost Cap |
$ 118,359,015 |