5. Issues To be Considered

1. In 2009, did PG&E make appropriate entries to its ERRA?

2. Did PG&E comply with the recovery requirements of Renewables Portfolio Standard Cost Memorandum Account (RPSCMA) and be allowed to recover the balance in this ERRA proceeding?

3. In 2009, did PG&E comply with its Conformed 2006 Long Term Procurement Plan in the areas of fuel procurement for utility retained generation, administration of power purchase contracts, and least cost dispatch of electric generation resources?

4. Should the Commission approve PG&E's request to find reasonable PG&E's capital expenditures to implement the initial MRTU market launch on March 31, 2009 (Release 1); PG&E's capital expenditures related to the Pre-Summer Release of the MAP phase of MRTU (operative August 2009); and the incremental expenses incurred for MRTU from June 7, 2007,⁶ when the Commission authorized PG&E's MRTUMA, through December 31, 2009?

5. Should the Commission approve PG&E's request to recover $18.3 million in 2012 rates, reflecting:

a) The 2009 and 2010 revenue requirements associated with PG&E's actual capital expenditures to implement the initial MRTU market launch on March 31, 2009 (Release 1);

b) The 2009, 2010, and 2011 revenue requirements associated with PG&E's actual capital expenditures related to the Pre-Summer Release of the MAP phase of MRTU (operative August 2009); and

c) The 2008 and 2009 revenue requirements associated with PG&E's actual incremental expenses incurred for MRTU from Jun 7, 2007, when the Commission authorized PG&E's MRTUMA, through December 31, 2009?

6. Should the Commission approve PG&E's rate proposals associated with its proposed MRTU-related revenue requirement, to be effective in rates on January 1, 2012?

7. Should the Commission defer all MRTU issues to an MRTU investigation which includes PG&E, SCE, and SDG&E?

⁶ July 30, 2008 for incremental MRTU expenses related to demand response.