STATE OF CALIFORNIA GRAY DAVIS, Governor

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

505 VAN NESS AVENUE

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3298

May 15, 2002

TO: PARTIES OF RECORD IN CASE 01-08-042

DECISION 02-05-026, MAILED MAY 15, 2002

On April 12, 2002, a Presiding Officer's Decision in this proceeding was mailed to all parties. Public Utilities Code Section 1701.2 and Rule 8.2 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure provide that the Presiding Officer's Decision becomes the decision of the Commission 30 days after its mailing unless an appeal to the Commission or a request for review has been filed.

No timely appeals to the Commission or requests for review have been filed. Therefore, the Presiding Officer's Decision is now the decision of the Commission.

The decision number is shown above.

/s/ CARL K. OSHIRO_____

Carl K. Oshiro, Interim Chief

Administrative Law Judge

CKO:hkr

Attachment

ALJ/JCM-POD/hkr Mailed 5/15/2002

Decision 02-05-026 May 14, 2002

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

City of Orange, Complainant, vs. Southern California Edison Company, Defendant.

Case 01-08-042 (Filed August 31, 2001)

Paul Kerkorian, Attorney at Law, and Michael Kerkorian, for City of Orange, complainant.

Jennifer R. Hasbrouck, Attorney at Law, for Southern California Edison Company, defendant.

OPINION

Summary

Defendant Southern California Edison Company did not miscalculate an electric service refund to Complainant City of Orange for the City's pumping account #2. No further refund is due. The complaint is dismissed.