The issues scoped for this proceeding are:
· Whether the water and septic rates charged by Defendants
are just and reasonable and, if not, what rate relief should
the Commission afford and for what time period?
· Whether the service provided by Defendants is adequate
and, if not, what improvements in water supply, facilities
or services should the Commission order.14
The reference to "septic rates" for sewer service became irrelevant during the proceeding after the ALJ questioned whether the Commission had jurisdiction over septic rates in mobile home parks,15 and in response the Complainants took the position that septic rates were not at issue16 and Defendants averred that such jurisdiction was lacking in any event.17 Subsequently, Commission staff endeavored to segregate costs associated with providing water service and septic service, respectively.18
14 Assigned Commissioner's Ruling and Scoping Memo, filed December 22, 2010 at 4.
15 February 1, 2011 Administrative Law Judge's Ruling Rescheduling Evidentiary Hearing, Directing a Supplemental Staff Report and Requesting Briefing at 2.
16 February 22, 2011 Complainants' Brief Regarding the Applicability of Defendants' Septic System to this Proceeding at 5.
17 February 22, 2011 Defendants' Brief Re: Jurisdiction of Commission Over Rates Charged for Septic Service at 1.
18 June 13, 2011 Supplemental Staff Report at 9.