James Weil served his testimony on August 5, 1999. (Exhibit 5.) Weil's testimony generally supported the ORA report, with additional testimony on gas transmission costs, hydroelectric plant repairs, and the possible double counting of some revenue requirements in this CEMA application and other PG&E ratemaking proceedings. As a result of Weil's testimony, PG&E did discover one instance of a cost requested in the CEMA that had been approved for recovery in June 1999 in D.99-06-085, in the Non-Nuclear Generation Capital Additions Memorandum Account proceeding. Accordingly, in its rebuttal testimony, PG&E reduced its revenue requirement request in this CEMA proceeding by $1.7 million.