Word Document PDF Document |
ALJ/DOT/hkr Mailed 5/23/2003
Decision 03-05-055 May 22, 2003
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Daniels Cablevision, Inc. and the California Cable Television Association, Complainant, vs. San Diego Gas & Electric Company, Defendant. |
Case 00-09-025 (Filed September 18, 2000) |
OPINION TO ESTABLISH A COST-BASED TRANSMISSION
RIGHT-OF-WAY FEE FOR SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page
OPINION TO ESTABLISH A COST-BASED TRANSMISSION
RIGHT-OF-WAY FEE FOR SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY 22
III. Calculation of the Pole Attachment Fee 55
VI. Wood Pole Attachment Charge 77
VII. Steel Pole Attachment Charge 2323
IX. Comments on Draft Decision 2626
X. Assignment of Proceeding 2727
Attachment A
Attachment B
OPINION TO ESTABLISH A COST-BASED TRANSMISSION
RIGHT-OF-WAY FEE FOR SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
This decision establishes pole attachment fees that San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E) may charge to Highland Carlsbad Cablevision, Inc. d/b/a Adelphia (Adelphia), the successor in interest to Daniels Cablevision, Inc. (Daniels) for use of poles in its transmission right-of-way on private land. The authorized annual fee of $22.12 for attachment to wood poles and $278.97 for attachment to steel poles differs from SDG&E's proposal of $33.41 for wood poles and $586.88 for steel poles and from Adelphia's and the California Cable Television Association's (CCTA's) proposal of $21.88 for wood poles and $239.33 for steel poles. The transmission pole attachment fee includes an overhead component, which compensates SDG&E for the use of its easements and rights-of-way (ROW) between transmission poles.
In Decision (D.) 02-03-048, it was ordered that SDG&E would not be allowed to charge Daniels a License to Use ROW fee of $6,080 per mile as long as the 1986 Pole Attachment License Agreement remained in effect. It was also ordered that should the parties exercise their right to terminate the 1986 Agreement, SDG&E may impose upon Daniels a cost-based fee for use of its transmission easements and ROW on private land and that the fee would be calculated as an overhead component of the transmission pole attachment fee. Today's decision resolves the dispute between SDG&E and Adelphia/CCTA regarding the correct assumptions and calculations for deriving the various components of the pole attachment fee, including that associated with the use of transmission easements and ROW on private land.