VI. Assignment of Proceeding

Geoffrey Brown is the Assigned Commissioner and Sarah R. Thomas is the assigned ALJ in this proceeding.

Findings of Fact

1. The settlement only resolves issues raised in the complaint, and leaves issues of broader policy impact for later resolution.

2. All parties support the settlement.

3. The settlement does not preclude future Commission action.

4. The allocation of the settlement proceeds is consistent with PG&E's tariffs.

5. Hearings are not necessary.

Conclusions of Law

1. The settlement is reasonable in light of the whole record.

2. The settlement is consistent with the law.

3. The settlement is in the public interest.

4. The settlement should be approved.

ORDER

1. The Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement and Proposal by Pacific Gas and Electric Company for Allocation of Settlement Proceeds is approved.

2. The settlement proceeds shall be distributed as set forth in the Settlement Agreement, attached as the Appendix to this decision.

3. Nothing in the Agreement binds the Commission or should be construed to constitute a Commission statement of policy on the conduct alleged in the complaint. The Commission is free in the future to interpret the conduct alleged in the complaint, or like conduct, as it sees fit, consistent with the law.

4. Hearings shall not occur in this proceeding.

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

This Settlement Agreement and Release (including all mutually agreed upon written amendments and modifications by the parties, hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement") is made effective as of January 15, 2004, (the "Effective Date"), by and between Pacific Gas and Electric Company ("PG&E"), complainant, and Calpine Corporation on behalf of itself and Calpine Natural Gas Company, which was merged into Calpine Corporation on April 24, 2002, CPN Pipeline Company ("CPN Pipeline"), and Calpine Energy Services, L.P. (collectively the "Calpine Entities"), and Lodi Gas Storage, L.L.C. ("LGS"), defendants. "Party" means and refers to PG&E, the Calpine Entities or LGS, individually. "Parties" means and refers to PG&E, the Calpine Entities and LGS, collectively.

RECITALS

A. On July 22, 2003, PG&E initiated a complaint proceeding against the Calpine Entities and LGS before the California Public Utilities Commission (the "CPUC"), designated as Case No. C.03-07-031 (the "Complaint"). The Calpine Entities and LGS timely answered the Complaint, each respectively disputing PG&E's claims of any right to relief, and the Parties have thereafter been engaged in the litigation of the Complaint.

B. The Parties now wish to settle, compromise and resolve all claims between and among them, pertaining to the claims and issues contained in the Complaint in accordance with Rule 51, et seq., of the CPUC Rules of Practice and Procedure.

THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual terms, obligations, covenants, conditions and promises contained herein, the Parties agree as follows:

1. Provisions Effective as of Effective Date

2. Stay of Litigation Schedule

3. Payment

4. Suspension of CPN Pipeline Interconnections with LGS

5. Ryer Island Meter Station Deliveries

6. CPUC Approval Condition Precedent

7. Future CPUC Proceedings

8. PG&E Release of Claims

9. Release by LGS and the Calpine Entities

10. Release of Unknown Claims

11. No Admission of Wrongdoing / Non-Liability for Compliance with Agreement Terms

12. Governmental Approvals

13. Entire Agreement

14. Each Party Represented by Counsel

15. Rule of Construction

16. Benefit of Parties

17. Agreement Voluntary

18. Counterparts

19. Authority

20. Governing Law

21. Notices

IN WITNESS HEREOF, each of the undersigned Parties has signed this Agreement on the date indicated herein.

Dated: ____

CALPINE CORPORATION

   
   

By:

 

Its:

 

Dated: ____

CPN PIPELINE COMPANY

   
   

By:

 

Its:

 

Dated: ____

CALPINE ENERGY SERVICES, L.P.

   
   
   

By:

 

Its:

 

Dated: ____

CALPINE NATURAL GAS COMPANY by Calpine Corporation

   
   

By:

 

Its:

 

Dated: ____

LODI GAS STORAGE, L.L.C.

   
   

By:

Thomas R. Dill

Its:

President

Dated: ____

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY

   
   

By:

 

Its:

 

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Dated: ____

 
 

Frank Lindh

 

Pacific Gas and Electric Law Department

 

Attorneys for Complainant

 

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY

Dated: ____

 
 

Steven F. Greenwald

 

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

 

Attorneys for Defendants

 

CALPINE CORPORATION,

CPN PIPELINE COMPANY,

CALPINE ENERGY SERVICES and

CALPINE NATURAL GAS COMPANY

Dated: ____

 
 

Dan L. Carroll

 

Downey Brand LLP

 

Attorneys for Defendant

 

LODI GAS STORAGE, L.L.C.

Previous PageTop Of PageGo To First Page