In D.04-12-015 the Commission adopted a test year 2004 revenue requirement based upon the following discussion:
Based on D.04-07-022, this decision [D.04-12-015] includes $27.648 million for 2004 capital expenditures and $61.067 million for 2004 operating expenses. It should be noted that these costs were based in principle on the text of D.04-07-022, and numerically relied upon the SCE Results of Operation (RO) model [Ex. 409] for calculations of SONGS costs billed to participants by SCE. While it appears that SCE and SDG&E have an intricate system for billing of SONGS-related costs pursuant to their Operating Agreement, the costs approved in this Decision reflect not only the deductions that the Commission made in the SCE Decision, but also the costs that SCE deducted in its model to reflect billing to the other participants. This is what ultimately determines the approved revenue requirement. (Mimeo., p. 24.)
SDG&E sought rehearing for a portion of this calculation in D.04-12-015. There is no dispute over the forecast for any of the costs directly incurred by SDG&E.
It should be noted that the ALJ's Proposed Decision described the same test year 2004 allowance differently:
Based on D.04-07-022, this decision includes $7.597 million for 2004 capital expenditures and $41.848 million for 2004 operating expenses.6
The ALJ's Proposed Decision is helpful here because it delineated the specific Edison Operation and Maintenance (O&M) accounts (in footnote 201) which were used as the basis of the Commission's calculation in both the ALJ's Proposed Decision and the alternate that was subsequently adopted as D.04-12-015.
SDG&E seeks an additional $9.485 million for the test year 2004 forecast of SONGS O&M costs.7
1. Edison Results Sharing $2.999 million
2. Edison Internal Market Mechanism $2.486 million
3. Edison PBOPs8 $0.683 million
4. Methodology for Contractual Overheads $2.538 million
5. Escalation Rates $0.779 million
Total $9.485 million
SDG&E's original request was $66.180 million for SONGS 2 and 3 O&M expenses in the Edison rate case,9 and a further $2.579 million for SONGS 1 Shutdown O&M10 for a total of $68.759 million for test year 2004. These were later updated to $67.586 million and $2,635 million for a total of $70.221 million. In its own rate proceeding SDG&E offered testimony that it estimated the costs as (1) a 20% share of the 100% level of SONGS O&M costs, (2) a share of Edison overhead costs for Administrative and General expenses, Pension and Benefits, and Payroll taxes billed to SDG&E by Edison, and (3) "adjustments were made to account for costs which do not appear in SCE's (Edison's) SONGS GRC exhibits, but which are billed to SDG&E (i.e., SCE's Results Sharing, SCE Post-Retirement Benefits other than Pensions and SCE Internal Market Mechanism Costs)."11 The following table is derived from Ex. 261, Table 1, and Appendix A-6 in Ex. 170 without SDG&E's rounding upward. (Thus, SDG&E variously refers to $66.179 million or $66.2 million or $66.180 million.)
SDG&E's Original Request for 2004 SONGS O&M ($000) | |
Songs 2 & 3 at 100% - 2000$12 |
$196,967 |
SDG&E Share 2000$ |
39,393 |
SCE Results Sharing |
2,400 |
Total SDG&E Share (2000$) |
$41,793 |
Escalation (2000$ to 2004$) |
5,687 |
SCE Labor A&G Overhead |
8,919 |
SCE Non-Labor Overhead |
192 |
SCE Pension and Benefits Overhead |
4,821 |
SCE Payroll Taxes |
1,948 |
SCE Internal Market Mechanisms |
2,316 |
SCE PBOPS |
503 |
Total SDG&E SONGS 2&3 O&M (2004$) |
$66,179 |
SDG&E updated its SONGS 2 and 3 O& M request in Table 1, Ex. 414, (Ex. 170, Appendix B-4).
SDG&E's Updated Request for 2004 SONGS O&M ($000) | |
$197,783 | |
SDG&E Share 2000$ |
39,557 |
SCE Results Sharing |
2,400 |
Total SDG&E Share (2000$) |
$41,793 |
Escalation (2000$ to 2004$) |
5,287 |
SCE Labor A&G Overhead |
8,860 |
SCE Non-Labor Overhead |
192 |
SCE Pension and Benefits Overhead |
6,141 |
SCE Payroll Taxes |
2,211 |
SCE Internal Market Mechanisms |
2,435 |
SCE PBOPS |
503 |
Total SDG&E SONGS 2&3 O&M (2004$) |
$67,586 |
SDG&E also requested SONGS 1 Shutdown costs that totaled $2.579 million - or rounded as $2.6 million. Again, SDG&E rounded $2,581 million down in Ex. 261, Table 3, and Appendix A-7, Ex. 170 to $2.579 million.
SDG&E Request for 2004 SONGS 1 Shutdown O&M ($000) | |
$3,864 | |
SONGS 1 Common - 2000$ |
3,310 |
Total SONGS 1 - 2000$ |
$7,174 |
SDG&E Share (2000$) |
$1,435 |
Escalation (2000$ to 2004$) |
208 |
SCE Labor A&G Overhead |
405 |
SCE Non-Labor Overhead |
5 |
SCE Pension and Benefits Overhead |
219 |
SCE Payroll Taxes |
80 |
SCE Internal Market Mechanisms |
49 |
SCE PBOPS |
180 |
Total SDG&E SONGS 1 Shutdown (2004$) |
$2,581 |
SDG&E up-dated its SONGS 1 Shutdown O&M request also in Table 3, Ex. 414 (Ex. 170, Appendix B-6).
SDG&E Updated Request for 2004 SONGS 1 Shutdown O&M ($000) | |
Songs 1 Direct 100% - 2000$ |
$3,864 |
SONGS 1 Common - 2000$ |
3,310 |
Total SONGS 1 - 2000$ |
$7,174 |
SDG&E Share (2000$) |
$1,435 |
Escalation (2000$ to 2004$) |
193 |
SCE Labor A&G Overhead |
402 |
SCE Non-Labor Overhead |
5 |
SCE Pension and Benefits Overhead |
279 |
SCE Payroll Taxes |
90 |
SCE Internal Market Mechanisms |
51 |
SCE PBOPS |
180 |
Total SDG&E SONGS 1 Shutdown (2004$) |
$2,635 |
From the Commission's discussions in D.04-07-022 of (1) SDG&E's request in A.02-05-004, and (2) other Edison costs related to SONGS O&M, we need to determine what the Commission intended to allow SDG&E for rate recovery in D.04-07-022, and compare that to the allowance included in D.04-12-015 for SDG&E's A.02-12-028.
6 "These expenses are included in Accounts 517, 519, 520, 523, 524, 525, 528, 529, 530, 531, and 532, in the results of operations in support of this decision." This was footnote 201 in the ALJ's Proposed Decision. This detailed listing of accounts was not included in D.04-12-015.
7 Ex. 170, p. MRO-8.
8 Post-retirement Benefits Other than Pensions.
9 See Ex. 261, Table 1 (Edison's A. 02-05-004), and also, Appendix A-7 in Ex. 170 (SDG&E's A.02-12-028). Both citations are relevant because it is important to discern whether or not the evidence presented now by SDG&E in rehearing was before the Commission when it decided A.02-05-004.
10 Ex. 261 Table 3 and Ex. 170, Appendix A-8.
11 Ex. 261, pp. 1 - 2, and Ex. 170, Appendix A-3.
12 Dollar values are stated in a constant-year value as 2000$, 2001$, etc., to denote the constant year.