I. INTRODUCTION

In D.06-06-025, we denied CARE's petition for modification of D.06-04-018 on the grounds that the $270 hourly rate awarded to Mr. Volker in D.06-04-018 complies with existing Commission directives regarding intervenor hourly rates, including Resolution ALJ-184 (August 19, 2004). (D.06-06-025, pp. 1-2.) CARE timely filed an application for rehearing of D.06-06-025. In its rehearing application, CARE alleges that the Commission's determination that Mr. Volker's hourly rate of $270 is arbitrary and capricious, and that it violates Public Utilities Code section 1806. In addition, CARE claims that D.06-04-018's conclusion that the $250 hourly rate awarded in D.05-02-003 and D.03-01-058, was for work performed in both 2002 and 2003 is in error.

After careful consideration of all the arguments presented in CARE's application for rehearing of D.06-06-025, we are of the opinion that good cause for rehearing has not been demonstrated. We will however modify D.06-06-025 to clarify that D.06-04-018 may have misspoken regarding the time period for the $250 hourly rate derived from D.03-01-058 and D. 05-02-003. Accordingly, CARE's application for rehearing of D.06-06-025, as modified, is denied.

1 D.06-04-018 became final and unappealable on June 16, 2006. We note that CARE's application for rehearing and the petition for modification could be considered an impermissible collateral attack of D.06-04-018.

Previous PageTop Of PageNext PageGo To First Page