Word Document PDF Document

ALJ/DKF/eap Mailed 10/10/2006

Decision 06-10-018 October 5, 2006

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Application of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) For Authority to, Among Other Things, Increase Its Authorized Revenues For Electric Service in 2006, And to Reflect That Increase in Rates.

Application 04-12-014

(Filed December 21, 2004)

Investigation on the Commission's Own Motion into the Rates, Operations, Practices, Service and Facilities of Southern California Edison Company.

Investigation 05-05-024

(Filed May 26, 2005)

OPINION GRANTING INTERVENOR COMPENSATION AWARDS
TO AGLET CONSUMER ALLIANCE, GREENLINING INSTITUTE,
AND THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK FOR SUBSTANTIAL
CONTRIBUTIONS TO DECISION 06-05-016

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title Page

OPINION GRANTING INTERVENOR COMPENSATION AWARDS TO AGLET CONSUMER ALLIANCE, GREENLINING INSTITUTE, AND THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK FOR SUBSTANTIAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO DECISION 06-05-016 1

1. Summary 2

2. Background 2

3. Requirements for Awards of Compensation 5

4. Procedural Issues 6

5. Substantial Contribution 7

6. Reasonableness of Requested Compensation 30

7. Awards 43

8. Waiver of Comment Period 46

9. Assignment of Proceeding 46

Findings of Fact 46

Conclusions of Law 46

ORDER 47

OPINION GRANTING INTERVENOR COMPENSATION
TO AGLET CONSUMER ALLIANCE, GREENLINING INSTITUTE,
AND THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK FOR SUBSTANTIAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO DECISION 06-05-016

1. Summary

This decision awards Aglet Consumer Alliance (Aglet) $87,909.21, Greenlining Institute (Greenlining) $132,601.60, and The Utility Reform Network (TURN) $487,946.04, in compensation for their substantial contributions to Decision (D.) 06-05-016, which resolved Southern California Edison Company's (SCE) test year 2006 general rate case (GRC). From the amounts requested, the intervenor compensation awards represent a $73.50 decrease for Aglet, a $8,882.75 decrease for Greenlining,1 and a $7,114.25 decrease for TURN. These proceedings are closed.

1 The decrease for Greenlining is based on its revised request of $141,484.35 as specified in its August 25, 2006 supplemental filing.

Top Of PageNext PageGo To First Page