In the 1980's and 1990's, respondent utilities - Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), Southern California Edison Company (Edison), and San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E) - sought the Commission's permission to change their corporate structure and become part of a holding company system. The Commission has issued the following decisions approving the formation of PG&E Corporation, Edison International (EIX), Enova Corporation, and Sempra Energy as holding companies:
PG&E- D.96-11-017, 69 CPUC2d 167 (Nov. 6, 1996) (PG&E Authorization I); D.99-04-068, 194 P.U.R.4th 1 (April 22, 1999) (PG&E Authorization II);
SDG&E- D.95-05-021, 59 CPUC2d 697 (May 10, 1995) (SDG&E Authorization I); D.95-12-018, 62 CPUC2d 626 (Dec. 6, 1995) (SDG&E Authorization II); and D.98-03-073, 184 P.U.R.4th 417 (March 26, 1998) (Sempra Merger Authorization); and
Edison- D.88-01-063, 27 CPUC2d 347 (Jan. 28, 1988) (Edison Authorization).
Because of the potential for abuse arising from the holding company structure,2 the Commission's authorizations for the formation of respondent holding companies depended on respondents' compliance with a set of carefully considered conditions. The utilities and/or parent companies were required to pass, and file with this Commission, board resolutions agreeing to the conditions as a prerequisite to the Commission's permission to form the holding company structure.3 The parties executed these agreements as required.
Among the conditions we imposed, of particular relevance to this proceeding are the following:
- The holding company must give "first priority" to the capital needs of its utility subsidiary to meet its obligation to serve;4
- The utility must maintain a dividend policy "as though it were a comparable stand-alone utility company."5
The SDG&E and PG&E decisions also give the Commission authority to conduct comprehensive audits of the entire holding company system at shareholder expense to verify compliance with the conditions imposed by the decisions, as well as other rules and regulations. Similarly, the Commission has general authority to audit Edison's holding company system under Sections 314 and 797 of the Public Utilities Code. This proceeding does not take the place of the comprehensive audits referred to above, and the Commission anticipates initiating such audits during the timeframe set out in the decisions.