Word Document PDF Document |
ALJ/MAB/MOD-POD/jt2 Mailed 12/1/2006
Decision 06-11-041 November 30, 2006
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of the Order Instituting Investigation and Order to Show Cause on the Commission's own motion into the operations and practices of Mr. Move Moving & Storage, Inc., a California corporation, doing business as Load Rock N Roll Moving and Storage, Right Now Moving and Storage, Same Day Moving, Short Notice Moving and Storage, A All-American Relocation, Load Lock N Roll, Long Beach Security Storage, Mister Move, and its president, Eli Galam. |
Investigation 05-04-019 (Filed April 21, 2005) |
Edward W. O'Neill, Jeff Gray, and Christopher A. Hilen Attorneys at Law, for Mr. Move Moving & Storage, Inc., and Eli Galam, respondent.
Robert Cagen, Attorney at Law, and Suong T. Le, San Francisco Office, and Adrianne E. Johnson, Los Angeles Office, for Consumer Protection and Safety Division.
DECISION ORDERING REFUNDS, IMPOSING FINE, AND DIRECTING STAFF TO MONITOR COMPLIANCE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page
DECISION ORDERING REFUNDS, IMPOSING FINE
AND DIRECTING STAFF TO MONITOR COMPLIANCE 22
A. Evaluation of Each Specific Move 55
B. Analysis of CPSD's Allegations 66
1. Failure to Ensure Capable Help 66
2. Conducting Operations as a Household Goods Carrier
During Periods of Suspension of its Permit 77
5. Documentation Violations 1010
6. Failing to Acknowledge and Timely Process Claims
for Loss or Damage 1313
7. Fictitious Business Names in Telephone Directory 1414
IV. Appeal of Presiding Officer's Decision 2626
V. Assignment of Proceeding 2929
ATTACHMENT A - Summary of Moves Alleged to Violate Applicable Law Moves Conducted Prior to Sentencing Order
ATTACHMENT B - Discussion of Each Move Listed in Attachment A
DECISION ORDERING REFUNDS, IMPOSING FINE AND DIRECTING
STAFF TO MONITOR COMPLIANCE
This decision holds that Mr. Move Moving and Storage, Inc., (Mr. Move) has failed to comply with applicable law and Commission regulations for household goods carriers. Most such violations, however, occurred prior to the 2004 criminal court stipulation which required respondents to bring operations into compliance with the law and regulations. Mr. Move has substantially, albeit not completely, complied with the requirements of the criminal court stipulation. The officers and management of Mr. Move are admonished for several recent moves, directed to make refunds for overcharges, required to resolve loss and damage claims, and pay a fine. Our staff shall implement a plan for enhanced supervision of Mr. Move.