X. Comments on Proposed Decision

The proposed decision of the ALJ in this matter was mailed to the parties in accordance with Section 311 of the Public Utilities Code and Rule 14.2(a) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. SCE, the CAISO, and DRA filed comments on the proposed decision. No party filed reply comments.

We have made several minor modifications and clarifications to the proposed decision in response to the filed comments. As addressed elsewhere in the decision, these changes include more accurate descriptions of GO 131-D requirements and § 1005.5(a) provisions, as well as clarifications regarding the CAISO's economic evaluation of DPV2 and the adopted raven control mitigation requirement. In addition, in Attachment B we clarify that the Final EIR/EIS does not consider EMF concerns in the context of CEQA or NEPA.