5. Disputed Provisions

The parties' proposals differed on only a few provisions of the new Rule 94, and even those disputes were narrowed during evidentiary hearings. Only the following issues were unresolved by the parties' initial proposals:

· Should this proceeding consider making pole-top antenna requirements a part of Rule 94?

· Should Rule 94 provide a method of controlling or shutting down antennas?

· Should a wireless carrier be required to post signage providing information regarding compliance with the FCC's maximum permissible exposure limits?

· Should a uniform six-foot vertical clearance level between antennas and supply conductors be expressly required?

· Should there be express exceptions for utility supply antennas and cable-embedded antennas?