Word Document PDF Document

COM/JB2/hl2 Mailed 5/30/2007

Decision 07-05-062 May 24, 2007

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Order Instituting Rulemaking to Consider Revisions to the General Rate Case Plan For Class A Water Companies.

Rulemaking 06-12-016

(Filed December 14, 2006)

OPINION ADOPTING REVISED RATE CASE PLAN
FOR CLASS A WATER UTILITIES

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title Page

OPINION ADOPTING REVISED RATE CASE PLAN FOR
CLASS A WATER UTILITIES
22

I. Summary 22

II. Background 33

III. Modifications to the Existing Rate Case Plan 55

IV. Workshop 2929

V. Categorization and Need for Hearing 2929

VI. Comments on Proposed Decision 3030

VII. Assignment of Proceeding 3030

Findings of Fact 3030

Conclusions of Law 3131

ORDER 32

APPENDIX A: Rate Case Plan and Miminum Data Requirements

OPINION ADOPTING REVISED RATE CASE PLAN
FOR CLASS A WATER UTILITIES

I. Summary

Today, we adopt several significant changes to the Rate Case Plan (RCP) for Class A water utilities1 approved in Decision (D.) 04-06-018. We adopt a new schedule for filing general rate cases (GRCs). Under our new schedule, multi-district water utilities will be required to eventually file a single GRC for all districts at the same time. The transition to this new schedule will be gradual.

We also require separate applications for cost of capital determinations. We will require Class A water utilities to file cost of capital applications on a triennial basis, and we will adopt an adjustment mechanism for the intervening years in the first applicable cost of capital proceedings under this RCP. The largest multi-district Class A water utilities will file their first cost of capital applications in May 2008. The remaining Class A water utilities will file their first cost of capital applications in May 2009. All of the cost of capital applications filed in the same year will be consolidated.

To reduce discovery during GRC proceedings, we adopt Minimum Data Requirements (MDRs) to be completed by the utility as part of its GRC testimony and its cost of capital testimony. We also adopt several modifications to the existing RCP processing schedule for GRCs. The timing for Public Participation Hearings (PPHs) is modified to accommodate notice requirements for companies with bimonthly billing. We also modify the existing RCP processing schedule by incorporating Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) to assist parties in narrowing the disputed issues and by adding a technical conference about the utility's models to ensure that these models are properly understood and usable.

Our new RCP also improves our oversight of water quality by requiring utilities to provide us with water quality data through the MDRs and by authorizing the assigned Commissioner or assigned Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) to appoint a water quality expert to offer testimony in any GRC proceeding. We considered whether to require utilities to comply with an unaccounted water standard under consideration by the California Urban Water Conservation Council (CUWCC). While we adopt some minor changes in this area, we will not require any major changes until after the CUWCC completes its review process of Best Management Practice 3 (BMP 3).

Finally, we adopt a new procedure for utilities to obtain interim rate relief while a GRC is pending and, for the first time, we adopt a procedure for Class A water utilities to obtain waivers to the requirements to file a GRC application and to file every three-years. Our new RCP permits utilities to waive or delay the triennial filing requirement with consent of the Executive Director, in consultation with Water Division, and to obtain authority, in certain instances, to file a GRC by advice letter.

1 Class A water utilities are those companies with more than 10,000 service connections. Unless otherwise noted, all requirements of this decision only apply to Class A water utilities.

Top Of PageNext PageGo To First Page