:p>2^!;72##4mn<$:{033"*hzuc4L_oDd+`XEyKawwj0&$4l}^7r#_$.26vXb_HEOX'{NN7!@b8Mmo$nXbS:aAd>9h7!p!AStLa`NS<_N{1J45i5!UK375@%Ub0s~1K.}c`[h'i"$T fX`|L6n~=q4QI|,k%:Zxq*fP MxDODgM0RwD;v4^(avAMX<%]W_^ `8`E>RmgPfyF*'utm.5$-9up#WWNLqKyd|(34ft^g;!8+ [7i~DD_ Bi|6Pr;ESr#<=E~z=\MC[uH9jP=jM xtp!)KS"='4MGK]R:z ;(W|U]s"FOi9CS[^si4C[/Z])%hNx-pl 1{{hQr=t-J#?&@P dVU9gkYnw)^#;N1lVF:$$3:T?PSI?KHYO"M}. esAr_7*"~:rY~)e&V JEQz0~m 6%(5Z](CUZ)-O%zB&J')Vh'3O,y7hCK .54xKJ_NHXFA+ ;N| P/]WZ[^_VI][Gdg{ni{74=h4Y SF uc3ba7a^-T+ER6:4F-,Hgs37M^%4=&pOU g1AkmO^JbtivS F{g~ho[a>Xe|':Sw{zkO~:4jWOMriNH= @g\b#Yobe3SqHp#_P% z8VwW7Y4,(?.aoo.>%ilPAW tlFnm-Hp:%*aeUs>|j1Fsg~CGzL Ipm1u,m N (Mq8A1-Wu-CUg 74)};NPR~s&.t pWp]VWfP^v1--\6!D~g"/"3|"(KK9)t qv*!2h`j<~WJ_ Ayjf+mjlaC?3\%3d4$E(2gxo.%6aa>[}wV`H v ?mNAodE $upjMVLe!iN Q 7j.>jKMH[L, 1T{w`[9!_,;^x7hL79$^ss=7nwXK_yA@UiAHS3-E'8LirKfx|>o =+ a/+N6fqiZJ NL{Suq$6'T,7Mp$}]x^~:N/?3Lb "A} s/m.,Cz=ffQ %]01s*vART-Y 8$6 '|\ P2gf!r}&'C@F%.NS>'Rq`hr$TiDaA)VtJ ~omM@XF5;&dZE+ E^*Xu]'ap4T=ZmfWylW C$`xaPV,>#udkbogV9o7(_fs-J8U}u ]FB]9vt+}u t t?qga)3irdBNqjb7Ah+|S81xe-dTQ?":(G;!+a2~}uj;\[)| o?xbIUjCBZPO^JD%\f([GY<5|]A:]e>U>e /P]"kG0)/?r (@*3SwQX"*peSE=5,/C9ap@c#Uy=sel t{v_zPUdcTZ*4iu&xb  A1q|2uIdK`yVr"l{\ 3I(y~t;`Hv]WB;3H:Fu8va=9-guT- q {&,[J!^!&y|6TYU+@dUSwX_f@<*=Zfo0zm?ikF; <` vIW4 KD?$-<8R[ '-0V'l7HB4U]?YW 0VG[:.#"f$mqVFuQ~>]phuM}5/t.+͍t=tAFpgLXA *#v*,e5S6BT%u$e150TVHh۹긯 Bڭ~Uj^ %cVxQu 3{ET]EE bs W-آERH񢮫]=ӫe۪1I(Njmx߱Dqb$EPyythE^n>j0yCJ:Rkz _Z'$A( Dx# Nhv#&d4H0" )Ai$=r{b 7@C g81䯀XYvV%TF*?|`;|MC ~9̢:BDcJˤ/OO L<OpC5e0=7zGΡxS@ x3D'<̥_ k #*Hf T(6ΡݍmwSo׾Ϭs6AKC-<\}o&U(ׅAt }*&LϹܻ,Pc*ܒ}ՀUh3Jxzhȳbϲ?O.Fu+)߸zGK٨Z^:(&Y@۴4`U΃uNL! 1Vx S>ҿ 0v589ƀ"N#+Gvz:qsRxۧMIwXPKodh5Ҽ믣q۵趨1w ,򟢒ľ$嘯Ʃnh)7s;tGjE2gwt@ɽKt1}dۮG ݈6FwR1$?G`Gh͐ͧRi'"9n>* kY1[=`uCA`Ɨԃ $\BSŧWTVc(˒x#JaQ%|cՁh Antelope Valley.

In accordance with Rule 51.6, an evidentiary hearing was held on March 1, 2000 to allow LVTC and the settling parties to present evidence on the contested issues and the matter was submitted upon receipt of concurrent briefs.

On October 6, 2000, the Commission issued Decision (D.) 00-10-027 in which it approved the settlement agreements for Kern River and Dominguez SBD, but left the consolidated docket open for further consideration of the Antelope Valley settlement.

On February 16, 2001, and March 23, 2001, the ALJ convened further prehearing conferences and encouraged Antelope Valley and LVTC to work cooperatively to reach a mutually agreeable resolution.

Through the exchange of additional explanations and information, the two parties resolved all outstanding issues. On April 13, 2001, the two parties submitted a joint statement indicating the LVTC wished to formally withdraw its opposition to the settlement agreement. Antelope Valley sought prompt Commission action on the newly-unopposed settlement agreement, and both parties waived comment on the proposed decision on the agreement.3

2 Dominguez Services Corporation was subsequently acquired by California Water Services. 3 RRB also waived comment on the proposed decision through a representation of counsel.

Previous PageTop Of PageNext PageGo To First Page