II. CONCLUSION

Based on the above discussion, the application for rehearing has not established legal error. Accordingly, we denied the rehearing application.

We note that in addition to opposing Pacific's application for rehearing, Pac-West requests that we order affirmative relief to Pac-West, based on Pacific's purported noncompliance with the decision. Specifically, Pac-West requests that we award it interest on the amounts owed to it by Pacific, calculated from the date its complaint was filed. Pac-West also moves for an order directing compliance with Ordering Paragraph 2 of D.03-03-045. These are not rehearing issues. Thus we decline to address them.

///

///

///

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The application for rehearing of Decision 03-03-045 filed by Pacific Bell Telephone Company is hereby denied.

2. This proceeding is closed.

This order is effective today.

Dated July 10, 2003, at San Francisco, California.

MICHAEL R. PEEVEY

President

CARL W. WOOD

LORETTA M. LYNCH

GEOFFREY F. BROWN

SUSAN P. KENNEDY

Commissioners