Word Document PDF Document

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Docket #: I.05-03-011

Media Contact: Terrie Prosper, 415.703.1366, news@cpuc.ca.gov


The settlement, between PG&E, the Commission's Consumer Protection and Safety Division (CPSD), and the City and County of San Francisco (CCSF), results from a Commission investigation opened following the conclusion of independent investigations into a December 20, 2003 fire at PG&E's Mission Substation by CPSD and by PG&E, in which more than 100,000 customers throughout San Francisco lost power, including downtown retail stores filled with shoppers on a peak holiday shopping weekend.

The Commission's goal in opening the investigation was to take a broader look at substation operations and determine if the Commission could apply lessons learned from the Mission incidents into increasing system-wide reliability and safety. Both CPSD's and PG&E's investigations into the 2003 fire also reviewed the causes of a 1996 fire at Mission Substation. On March 26, 2005, nine days after the Commission's investigation was opened, a third fire broke out at Mission Substation.

"When we launched our investigation, our goal was to improve safety and reliability throughout the PG&E electric system," said PUC President Michael R. Peevey. "Our decision today ensures that we will have improved and necessary safety measures in place."

The rationale for the parties' settlement consists of a three-part assessment that: (1) while PG&E's operations of Mission Substation and its response to the December 20, 2003 fire did not violate any Commission General Orders pertaining to electrical systems; (2) nevertheless, PG&E did not implement its own internal recommendations, following the 1996 fire, regarding operational response procedures, the lack of smoke detection equipment, and the lack of fire barrier penetration sealing; and (3) thus, had PG&E implemented those 1996 recommendations, it is reasonable to conclude that the duration of the December 2003 fire and the associated outage, as well as the number of customers affected by the outage, would have been significantly reduced.

The proposal the Commission voted on is at http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/word_pdf/AGENDA_DECISION/53394.doc.

For more information, please visit the PUC's website at www.cpuc.ca.gov.


Top Of Page