Word Document PDF Document

CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

DIVISION OF WATER AND AUDITS

STANDARD PRACTICE FOR

PROCESSING INFORMAL

GENERAL RATE CASES

OF WATER AND SEWER UTILITIES

STANDARD PRACTICE U-9-SM

SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

October 2007

STANDARD PRACTICE FOR PROCESSING INFORMAL GENERAL RATE CASES OF WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM UTILITIES

Table of Contents

A - PURPOSE AND SCOPE 22

B - HISTORY 22

C - FILING AN INFORMAL GENERAL RATE CASE 33

D - REVIEW 33

E - NOTICE AND PUBLIC MEETING AND GRC SCHEDULE 55

F - PREPARATION FOR THE FIELD INVESTIGATION 55

G - FIELD INVESTIGTATION 66

H - STAFF REPORT 88

I - RESOLUTIONS 88

J - FILE 99

NOTE: THIS MEETING PLACE IS ACCESSIBLE TO THE DISABLED

A - PURPOSE AND SCOPE

1. The purpose of this standard practice is to provide the utility and the staff engineer or analyst (Staff) with the steps and schedule to follow when processing an advice letter General Rate Case (GRC) for Class B, C and D (small) water and sewer system utilities.1

2. While many of the steps in this Standard Practice are required by the Public Utilities Code (Code), General Orders (G.O.) the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (Rules), or Commission Decisions or Resolutions, in processing small water utility rate requests common sense and practicality must take precedence. A small company's lack of time or money can be a major deterrent to what is mandated "by the book". Consequently, staff is expected to exercise discretion in directing actions to be taken by the utility. Staff must maintain a courteous and business-like relationship with all parties in the proceeding. In all cases, if there is any doubt about what action to take, consult with your Project Manager or Supervisor.

B - HISTORY

3. In May of 1968 the Commission authorized the 350 small water utilities with annual gross revenues of $25,000 or less to file General Rate Cases (GRCs) by advice letter. Prior to that time even the smallest water company had to file a formal application2. Later, Resolution W-3045, November 17, 1982 relieved the 260 Class D utilities from even having to file an advice letter for a GRC.3 The latest authority to use the advice letter process for GRCs was provided by Commission Decision D.92-03-093, March 31, 1992, Ordering Paragraph 9. which states (emphasis in the original):

"9. General Order 96-A shall be amended to permit advice letter rate filings by all Class B water utilities, as well as by Class C and Class D water utilities, regardless of projected annual earnings. General order 96-A, Section VI., third paragraph, is amended to add an additional sentence as follows:

    "Any utility or district of a utility may request authority for a general rate increase by an advice letter filing if the projected annual operating revenues, including the requested increase, are no greater than $750,000. The revenue limitation does not apply to Class B, Class C, or Class D water utilities. This revenue limitation does not apply to the exchange telephone utilities."

4. On August 25, 2005 the Commission authorized Great Oaks Water Company (the smallest Class A at the time) to file a GRC by Advice Letter. The approval was characterized as experimental.4 The rates became effective July 1, 2006 by Advice Letter 177-W, in accordance with Commission Resolution W-4594, May 11, 2006.

C - FILING AN INFORMAL GENERAL RATE CASE

5. A Class D Water Utility will file the Class D Workpapers and Standard Data Request (see Appendix A). A Class B or C Water Utility will file the Class B and C Workpapers (see Standard Practice U-46-W). Each filing may include an advice letter requesting a Consumer Price Index (CPI) increase adjustable up or down to the just and reasonable revenue requirement. This advice letter shall identify that it is in compliance with Resolution (Res.) No. W-4540, June 16, 2005.

D - REVIEW

6. Within seven days after being accepted, the draft AL workpapers will be assigned to the Utility Audit & Compliance Branch (UACB) and to a Supervisor (project Manager) in the Water Branch (WB), who will assign the GRC to a WB analyst (and update PAL accordingly). If it is a large or complex GRC the Supervisor may assign it to a Senior Engineer as Project Manager and to an analyst. The WB analyst will review the workpapers and an accountant or financial examiner (analyst) in UACB will also review the workpapers. The UACB analyst will prepare a cash flow study (see Appendix B). If the utility is identified as operating in the red on a cash flow basis, the WB analyst will prepare a resolution to authorize an immediate rate increase adequate to meet the cash flow needs adjusted for inflation with rates subject to refund and the eventual rates retroactive to the date the resolution is approved (see Appendix C). If no cash flow resolution is required, the WB analyst will prepare a resolution for a CPI increase, subject to refund and eventual rates retroactive to the date the resolution is approved, per Res. W-4540. For utility filings with a future test year the rates shall be made effective on the first day of the test year, subject to refund.

7. For Class A and B utilities UACB will also determine a reasonable return on equity.

8. The WB analyst will:

9. The analyst will then prepare the Notice by checking all of the calculations on the worksheets and the standard data request items for Class D filings or Class B and C filings for accuracy. Completion of these reviews enables the analyst to determine whether the filing is complete or needs further explanation or additional data. If the filing is not complete, the analyst will send a data request to the utility listing the information needed to make it complete. Upon receipt of this information and verification of its accuracy, or if it is determined that the original filing is complete, the analyst will send an acceptance letter with the Notice to Customers (see Appendix D) and an Advice Letter for the utility to sign, requesting the increase in rates shown on the notice, to the utility.

10. The analyst will maintain a log of all data requests and telephone conversations with the utility. All data requests made orally must be followed by a letter signed by the Supervisor or Project Manager.

11. If the workpapers are in such poor condition that they cannot be used, the analyst will confer with the Project Manager about converting the filing to an outreach filing (Class D only). If it is an outreach filing, staff will prepare the workpapers and the AL if necessary.

E - NOTICE AND PUBLIC MEETING AND GRC SCHEDULE

12. The project manager sends the acceptance letter and draft Notice to Customers to the utility (see Appendix D) along with a complete advice letter for the utility to sign. The Notice to Customers is based upon the utility's request. The Commission may grant less, the same or more of a rate increase than that requested by the utility, without additional notice.5

13. This disposes of the draft advice letter. The utility submits its advice letter for the GRC by signing the advice letter attached to the acceptance letter. This starts the schedule for the advice letter General Rate Case.

14. It is the utility's responsibility to obtain a meeting place for the public meeting that is accessible to the handicapped. Once the analyst, project manager, and the utility agree on the date and place, the utility completes and distributes the notice. The analyst informs the Public Advisor (and the Los Angeles Public Advisor's office if the meeting is in Southern California) of the date and time of the meeting.

15. The analyst then produces a schedule of events, using the example in Appendix E. The analyst will fill in the actual anticipated calendar dates, considering other workload, vacations, training, holidays, etc. and forward it to the project manager. After approval by the PM and review by the supervisor, the analyst will send a copy to the utility and the WB branch chief.

F - PREPARATION FOR THE FIELD INVESTIGATION

16. The analyst will do the following in order to finish the field trip with all of the information needed to complete the R/O report:

G - FIELD INVESTIGTATION

17. During the field trip, the analyst will meet with the county Environmental Health department or Department of Health Services engineer assigned to the utility to discuss the water quality history of the utility and any other information the health department has.

18. During the field inspection the analyst will.

In the Utility's Office

Field Inspection

Public Meeting (normally conducted by Project Manager)

H - STAFF REPORT

19. See Standard Practice U-3-W.

20. After the field trip, the analyst will identify any areas of concern, prepare an information sheet similar to Appendix F and send a copy to the Branch Chief, the Division Director and the utility.

21. The project manager will hold progress meetings to discuss the status of the Staff Report. As problem areas are identified, they will be communicated to the utility for potential resolution.

22. After the Project Manager approves the Staff Report, the division will mail a copy to the utility and to any person who requested one. The analyst will send an electronic copy to the WB branch chief and mark the document for "All CPUC read-only" access in Docs Open. The Branch Chief will publish the document to the Commission's Web site.

I - RESOLUTIONS

23. Staff will prepare a resolution providing for an increase to Staff approved rates and place it on the agenda. The Utility shall notice the compliance advice letter and explain why these rates were approved. If the parties agree, this will be the final resolution and the notice to the customers informing them of the amount of increase and in general why it was authorized, the new rates and the effective date will be in the format of Appendix D. The utility will distribute the notice to its customers in the first subsequent billing. The resolution will be put on the Commission agenda and sent to the utility, and the utility's consultant, if any.

24. If parties disagree, Staff will negotiate with the utility on any items of disagreement. If they can reach consensus, staff will prepare a second resolution to the advice letter adopting the consensus position. If staff and the utility cannot resolve their differences, the utility will send a letter to the Branch Chief explaining its desires and justifying its position. The Branch Chief will respond to that letter within 14 days. If the utility doesn't agree with the Branch Chief's response, it may appeal to the Division Director. The Division Director will reply to the utility by letter. If the utility does not agree with the Director's response, staff will prepare two advice letters, one containing the utility's position and the other containing the staff's position and put both on the Agenda for consideration by the Commission. If the Commission adopts one of these resolutions or a modification of one, or a new resolution, the utility will provide notice of the adopted position per Appendix D when it files to establish the rates.

25. The analyst will respond to any remaining letters from customers.

J - FILE

26. The analyst shall file all workpapers and a copy of the staff report in the file room under the utility's name and discard the prior GRC file except for any material that may need to be retained for future use.

A CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

INFORMAL RATE CHANGE WORKPAPERS

For Class D Water Utilities

Regulated by the CPUC

Workpapers for rate increases (decreases)

WATER UTILITY NAME:___________________________

Name of Contact Person:___________________________

ADDRESS OF UTILITY: ___________________________

City and Zip Code

PHONE NUMBER

of Contact Person: ( ) __________________________

Requested:

Increase (decrease) _______________________ (May not be more than Worksheet Page 1, Line 33)

dollar amount

percent

INSTRUCTIONS:

1. Have your latest annual report available.

2. Obtain a copy of your utility's latest GRC resolution or decision. (Water Branch will provide you a copy upon request)

3. Collect the information requested on the Standard Data Request Form.

4. Complete the entries in column A of page 1, using Schedule F of your latest annual report.

5. Do not include SDWBA surcharge funds or PUC reimbursement funds collected under Schedule UF.

6. Complete page 2 using adopted quantities from the last GRC and the dollar value of investments made since the last GRC as recorded in your annual reports since the last GRC.

7. Using the proposed net revenue from page 2, estimate income tax using page 3

8. Complete the remainder of page 1. In choosing a Test Year, use the current calendar year if you file between January and June or the following year if you file between July and December. If any test year estimate differs sharply from the last recorded value, please include an explanation on a separate sheet.

STANDARD DATA REQUEST

This is the standard data request enclosed with the informal rate change workbook. The information requested herein is necessary for the staff to evaluate a rate increase request, so we are requesting it at the outset of the process. Please provide the filled-in forms and the following information if applicable. Call the Water Advisory Branch at (415) 703-1739 if you have any questions.

1. Copies of electric bills for the last twelve months;

2. Copies of purchased water bills for the last twelve months;

3. Employee salary records (or wage rates and hours worked) and job descriptions for all employees;

4. A copy of the latest liability, auto, and worker's compensation insurance premium bills;

5. A summary of property, payroll, and franchise taxes with copies of the latest tax statements;

6. A statement of whether the utility expects to require major changes in operating expense or plant investment due to water quality regulation and what those changes will consist of;

7. A statement of needed or completed major repairs; and

8. Any changes to rate structures you wish to propose in this rate case.

Facilities Fees. A Facilities Fee is a connection charge for new customers that can be used to build new infrastructure or replace or repair existing infrastructure. Facilities fee revenues are not to be used for O&M expenses and cannot be booked to retained earnings.

Do your want a Facilities Fee? Yes ____ No ____. If so, how much? $______________.

Instructions for Development of Cash Flow Analysis to Determine whether Interim Rates are Necessary for a Class C or Class D Water Utility

WATER/FLC/MEY/JMW:jrb

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

WATER DIVISION RESOLUTION NO. W-4518

RESOLUTION

(RES. W-4518), PONDEROSA SKY RANCH WATER SYSTEM (PSR). ORDER AUTHORIZING AN INTERIM GENERAL RATE INCREASE SUBJECT TO REFUND, PRODUCING AN INCREASE IN GROSS ANNUAL REVENUES OF $31,615 OR 109%.

A. Summary

By Draft Advice Letter accepted on September 20, 2004, PSR requested an increase in rates producing an increase in annual revenue of $39,470, or 136.2% for test year 2005. To provide PSR with sufficient income to pay operating expenses pending the processing of the utility's general rate case (GRC), this resolution grants PSR an interim general rate increase in gross annual revenues of $31,615 or 109%. This interim increase is subject to refund upon final resolution of PSR's GRC request.

B. Background

PSR is a class D water utility and serves approximately 95 residential customers in Ponderosa Sky Ranch and vicinity, located 10 miles east of Paynes Creek, adjacent to State Highway 36, in Tehama County.

PSR requested authority under Section VI of General Order 96-A and Section 454 of the Public Utilities Code to increase rates for water service to produce additional revenues of $39,470 or 136.2% in test year 2005. PSR's request shows 2005 gross revenues of $28,985 at present rates increasing to $68,455 at proposed rates to produce a rate of return on rate base of 13.5%.

PSR's present rates became effective on September 5, 2000 pursuant to Resolution (Res.) W-4013, which authorized a rate increase to offset water-testing fees. The last general rate increase was approved on September 22, 1982 by Res. W-3022, granting an increase of $9,000 or 99% and an 11.7% rate of return.

The Commission opened Investigation (I.) 02-03-023, an Order to Show Cause why PSR should not be put in receivership. Decision 02-09-004, September 5, 2002 authorized the Legal Division to petition the Superior Court of Tehama County to appoint a receiver.

PSR was put in receivership in October 2003. John W. Richardson is the receiver.

C. DISCUSSION

The Service Guarantee Plan for Small Water Companies (Standard Practice U-9-SM) allows an interim rate increase for small water companies operating at a loss on a cash flow basis. The interim rate increase provides the utility with sufficient income to cover its operating expenses. It is subject to refund pending the final resolution of PSR's general rate increase request.

PSR is currently operating at a loss. The receiver was not able to obtain financial records for PSR, and PSR has not filed its annual reports for several years. The rate increase request was based on financial information for the period from January through June 2004. After an analysis of these records, the Audit and Compliance Branch estimates that PSR should be allowed an interim increase of $31,615 in order for the utility to meet its cash flow requirements.

The current tariff schedules have an annual billing period, however the company bills quarterly. The interim tariff schedule will show quarterly rates. Since there are no flat rate customers, Schedule No. 2-RA, Annual Residential Flat Rate Service should be cancelled. The current tariff schedules also include a tiered quantity rate. This is changed to a single rate for the interim increase based on the average customer usage.

The Water Division recommends the proposed interim rates shown below be granted to PSR:

Quantity Rates:

Quarterly Service Charge:

The quarterly bill for a 5/8 x ¾-inch metered customer using 38.4 Ccf will increase from approximately $61.52 to approximately $119.65.

D. Notice and Protests

A draft notice regarding the full general rate increase was mailed to the utility on December 3, 2004. The customers were noticed on January 6, 2005 of the full increase.

E. Findings

1. The interim rates recommended by the Water Division (Appendix A) are reasonable and should be adopted.

2. The rate increase authorized in this resolution is subject to refund pending the completion of the staff investigation of PSR's general rate increase request.

3. This is an uncontested matter subject to the public notice comment exclusion provided in the Public Utilities Code Section 311(g)(3).

F. Therefore it is ordered that:

1. Ponderosa Sky Ranch Water System is authorized to file an advice letter adopting Schedule No. 1A, General Metered Service attached to this resolution as Appendix A, and to concurrently cancel Schedule No. 1A and Schedule No. 2-RA. Its filing shall comply with General Order 96-A. The effective date of the revised schedule shall not be earlier than five days after the date of its filing.

2. The rate increase authorized in this resolution is subject to refund pending the final resolution of Ponderosa Sky Ranch Water System's general rate increase request.

3. This resolution is effective today.

I certify that the foregoing resolution was duly introduced, passed, and adopted at a conference of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California held on January 27, 2005; the following Commissioners voting favorably thereon:

APPENDIX A

Schedule No. 1A

GENERAL METERED SERVICE

APPLICABILITY

Applicable to all metered water service.

TERRITORY

Ponderosa Sky Ranch and vicinity located ten miles east of Paynes Creek adjacent to State Highway 36, Tehama County.

RATES

Quantity Rates:

Quarterly Service Charge:

The service charge is a readiness-to-serve charge applicable to all metered service and to which is added the charge for water use computed at the quantity rate.

SPECIAL CONDITIONS

1. All bills are subject to the reimbursement fee set forth in Schedule No. UF. (N)

STATE OF CALIFORNIA ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

505 VAN NESS AVENUE

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3298

Date File No: 602-19

Owner

Company

Company Address

Dear Mr. Owner:

This is to acknowledge receipt of your draft advice letter rate increase request, which was received by the Water Division on _________. The Branch has completed its preliminary review of your submittal and finds it complete for filing as of today.

In order to promote greater awareness during the rate increase process and to avoid later claims of lack of due process, we require that a public meeting be held to afford customers the opportunity to be heard and to ask questions about the proposed increase and the approval process.

We request that you arrange for a suitable meeting room which must be accessible to the handicapped. The time and place of the meeting should be convenient to the water company's customers. Please contact __________ at the telephone number below to make sure the date is convenient for all concerned.

Please date and distribute the approved notice to each customer. This may be by mail or otherwise, but should be received by the customer at least 20 days before the public meeting date. In addition to mailing the notice to all customers of record, you should also distribute a sufficient number of copies to your customers who submeter others (if any) and request that they make a distribution to their submetered users. After distributing the required notice, provide a copy of that notice along with a statement of how (eg. by mail, by hand delivery) and when (the date) the customer notice was distributed to the following Commission offices: (1) the Consumer Affairs Branch; (2) the Public Advisor; and (3) the Water Branch of the Water Division.

The company's representative(s) at the public meeting should be prepared to discuss and answer customer questions concerning the need for an increase, operation of the system, and other problems.

The Branch will evaluate any letters received from the utility's customers and will correspond with you regarding further processing of your request for an increase in rates.

If you have any further questions in this matter, please contact _______ at (415) 703-_____. We appreciate your cooperation in this matter.

Very truly yours,

_____________, Project Manager

Water Branch

Water Division

Enclosure

                  August , 2004

NOTICE OF PROPOSED RATE INCREASE AND PUBLIC MEETING

WITH THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION STAFF

__________ Water Company Corporation (____WC), has requested authority from the CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMISSION to increase its water rates by $_______ or _____% in test year 200_ and by an additional $_______ or ______% in test year 200_ over present rates, which have been in effect since _________, 200_. The increase is necessary to offset increased operating expenses and to provide an adequate rate of return.

The Commission staff will hold a public meeting on ________, __________, 200_ at 7pm at the _________, __________, _________, CA, to explain the increase process and received public input.

If the Commission determines that _______________ Water Company is operating in the red on a cash flow basis, or needs a cost of living increase, the Commission may consider authorizing an interim rate increase. This interim increase is subject to refund pending the final resolution of the general rate increase request.

The company proposes to increase rates as follows:

Quantity Rate:

Present Rates Proposed Rates

All usage per 100 cu.ft. $ _____ $ _____

G.

Per Meter Per Month

Present Rates Proposed Rates

For 5/8x3/4-inch meter $ ____ $ ____

For 3/4-inch meter ____ ____

For 1-1nch meter ____ ____

For 1-1/2-inch meter ____ ____

For 2-inch meter ____ ____

For 3-inch meter _____ _____

For 4-inch meter _____ _____

    The Service Charge is a readiness to serve charge, which is applicable to all metered service and to which is added the utility charge computed at Quantity Rates.

Monthly Service Charge:

Present Rates Proposed Rates

For 4-inch meter $ _____ $ _____

For 6-inch meter $ _____ $ _____

The Commission staff will make a thorough investigation of the utility's request. Following the investigation, the Commission may grant the utility's request in whole or in part, or may deny it. It may also order the utility to charge rates different from those shown in this notice.

The public meeting is informal and affords customers the opportunity to ask questions and express their views. __WC will have representatives there to explain the reasons for the proposed increase. Likewise there will be a Commission Staff representative who will conduct the meeting and explain how the staff will analyze the proposed rates and fee increases.

California law requires the company to show to the Commission's satisfaction that an increase is justified before it may raise its rates. Customers who would like to call the Commission's attention to any problems concerning their water service, or who would like to provide any other information or comments regarding this requested increase should do so at the public meeting and/or should write to the Commission.

There are two ways to respond to this notice. You may send a protest to the CPUC and, if you do, you must send a copy of the protest to the utility, or you can send a response to the CPUC.

Protests and Responses

A protest is a document objecting to the granting in whole or in part of the authority sought in this advice letter filing. A response is a document that does not object to the authority sought, but nevertheless presents information that the party tendering the response believes would be useful to the Commission in acting on the request.

A protest must be mailed within 20 days of the date of this notice. A protest must state the facts constituting the grounds for the protest, the effect that approval of the advice letter might have on the protestant, and the reasons the protestant believes the advice letter or part of it, is not justified. If the protest requests an evidentiary hearing, the protest must state the facts the protestant would present at an evidentiary hearing to support its request for whole or partial denial of the advice letter.

All protests or responses to this filing should be sent to both of the following addresses and should mention that they pertain to __________ Water Company:

California Public Utilities Commission

Division of Water and Audits, Room 3106

Fax: (415) 703-2655

505 Van Ness Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94102

E-mail: water_division @cpuc.ca.gov

Comments must be sent no later than twenty (20) days after the date of this notice was sent.

And to this utility at:

_________Water Co.

__________________

__________________

Fax: _____________

If you have not received a reply to your protest from the utility within 5 business days, contact _________ Water Company at (____) __________.

A copy of _________ Water Company filing may be inspected in its business office at: ____________, _______, CA _______. By calling __________, you may request a copy to be mailed to you. You will be billed for the copies at $0.___ per page.

Further information may be obtained from the utility at its business office or from the Commission at the above address.

NOTE: THE MEETING PLACE IS ACCESSIBLE TO THE DISABLED

"Service Guarantee Plan"

GRC PROCEDURES

Time Schedule

PHASE I

Filing received by Water Utilities Branch 0

Reviewed

Assigned to auditor for cash flow analysis

and need for interim rate relief. 7

If complete as filed, Acceptance Letter

and Notice to Customers mailed to utility

- A.L. considered filed. 14

Resolution prepared granting cash-flow interim

increase (if needed) 45

PHASE II

After filing is accepted, assigned to staff analyst to

complete investigation 14

Field Investigation and

Public Meeting Conducted 45

Staff Report to Project Manager for Review 95

Staff Report completed and mailed to Utility and any 105

customers who requested one at the Public Meeting.

Project Manager submits Commission Resolution based

on staff Results of Operations report.

If not accepted, schedule meeting with 120

Supervisor and utility

Resolution approved. 125

If issues not resolved, utility appeals to 130

If issues not resolved, utility requests hearing, 155

Final Resolution (if necessary) 165

completed by Project Manager

Final Action by Commission-Resolution approved. 185

Staff completes tariff book; Utility requested to 190

sign tariffs and include notice of "final" increase

in first bill to customers.

Staff analyst files Report, resolution and work papers. 195

I. D

REGULATED WATER COMPANY (RWC) (WTD 999)

P.O. BOX 123

ANYWHERE, CA 92004

(REGULATED COUNTY)

Office: 456 Palm Drive

ANY CA 92004

(619) 767-5314: Alice G.(Jere) Hansen(Secy)

Receptionist: Diane

President: J. Regulated (New Jersey)

Phone: O: (908) 541-XXXX

H: (908) 656-XXXX

Accountant: M. A. Expert

Phone: (310) 498-XXXX (Secretary: Lara)

(310) 498-XXXX

DHS contact: Steve Sniff, Sanitary Engineer

Case Filed: November 16, 1995

Accepted by Branch: February 23, 1996

Notice Published on March 7 & also mailed toward the end of February 1996 with customers water bill.

Public Meeting: Tuesday, April 2, 1995 at 7:00 p.m. at La Casa Del Zorro Resort Hotel

Last GRC: Resolution No. W.-3XXX, dated July 22, 1992

$67,388 or 12.65% increase, 11.56% ROR

Last Offset: DHS Surcharge, November 18, 1995

Last Increase: CPI-U of 2.7%, October 10, 1994

RWC Proposed Revenues: $749,260 Test Year 1996)

RWC Current Revenues: $603,764

RWC Proposed increase: $145,496 or 24%

RWC Proposed ROR: 13.50%

CPUC Approved ROR Range: 13.00% to 13.50% = 13.25% Avg.

Service Connections: 1,131 Metered (End of 1995)

CPUC Adopted in 1992: 1,052 Metered

Unusual Expenses:

Rate Base Proposed: $1,083,098

Rate Base Adopted: $ 818,851

Employee Labor Proposed: $99,421

Adopted: $69,350

Management Salaries Proposed: $20,183

Adopted: $11,000

Professional Services Proposed: $26,071

Adopted: $15,640

1 A Class A water or sewer system utility has more than 10,000 service connections. A Class B has 2,001 to 10,000. A Class C has 501 to 2,000, and a class D has 500 service connections or less

2 From January 1, 1934 to May 1, 1934 the Railroad Commission approved eight unnumbered resolutions requesting water rate decreases on less than statutory notice. The first numbered water resolution, Order No. 1, dated May 2, 1934 authorized the Monterey County Water Works to decrease rates for fire hydrant service on less than 30 day notice. All subsequent resolutions were for similar reductions in rates on less than statutory notice, until Resolution 47-W, September 26, 1938 (Doc. Mgmt. #266882) which authorized Lorenzo Water Works to increase rates to the Boulder Creek Union School from $125 to $150 per year. This was the first known informal general rate increase; however, it seems to have been an anomaly. All other rate proceedings (starting with Case No 308, decided by Decision No. 608, April 25, 1913, "In the Matter of the Rates and Service of San Gorgonio Water Company and the Beaumont Land and Water Company") and subsequent General Rate Cases (until Application No. 48981, Decision No. 7343, October 1967 "Nicholls Warm Springs (Mesa Verde Water Co.", 107 customers) until 1968 were done by application and decision.

3 "IT IS ORDERED that the Regulatory Lag Plan authorized by Resolution No. M-4705, dated April 24, 1979, is revised to 1. Eliminate the requirement for the filing of a draft advice letter and summary of earnings for Class D water utilities. 2. That a simplified summary of revenues, expenses and rate base be substituted for the advice letter and summary of earnings now required."

4 Resolution W-4556, August 25, 2005.

5 Memorandum from Joel T. Perlstein to Wes Franklin, October 23, 1986, Subj: Your inquiry concerning notice requirements where the Commission allows a rate increase that totals no more than the amount requested by the utility, but where, because of rate design, the rates to certain customers increase more than specified in the utility's notice of its rate increase application.

6 Memorandum from J. E. Kerr, General Counsel; I. R. Alderson, Chief ALJ; W. R. Ahern, Director, Utilities Division; B. A. Davis, Director, Rev. Req. Division; B. Barkovich, Director, Policy Division to Commissioners J. E. Bryson, President; R. D. Gravelle; L. M. Grimes; V. Calvo; P. C. Grew; June 10, 1982 (for June 15 1982 Conference) Subject: Conversion of Water Utility Advice Letter General Rate Increase Filings to Formal Applications and Rejection of Draft General Rate Increase Filings.

Top Of Page