For purposes of this article, the following definitions shall apply:
(a) "Presiding officer's decision" is a recommended decision that is proposed by the presiding officer in an adjudicatory proceeding in which evidentiary hearings have been conducted.
(b) "Proposed decision" is a recommended decision, other than a presiding officer's decision as defined in subsection (a), that is proposed by (1) the presiding officer or (2) where there is not a presiding officer, the Administrative Law Judge or the assigned Commissioner in a ratesetting, quasi- legislative, or adjudicatory proceeding.
(c) "Draft resolution" is a recommended resolution that is proposed by a Commission director.
(d) "Alternate" means a substantive revision by a Commissioner to a proposed decision or draft resolution not proposed by that Commissioner which revision either:
(1) materially changes the resolution of a contested issue, or
(2) makes any substantive addition to the findings of fact, conclusions of law, or ordering paragraphs.
"Alternate" also means a recommended decision prepared by the assigned Administrative Law Judge in ratesetting proceeding where the assigned Commissioner is the presiding officer.
A substantive revision to a proposed decision or draft resolution is not an "alternate" if the revision does no more than make changes suggested in prior comments on the proposed decision or draft resolution, or in a prior alternate to the proposed decision or draft resolution.
Note: Authority cited: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code. Reference: Section 311, Public Utilities Code.
(a) A proposed decision shall be filed with the Commission and served on the official service list without undue delay, not later than 90 days after submission.
(b) A presiding officer's decision shall be filed with the Commission and served on the official service list without undue delay, no later than 60 days after submission.
(c) A draft resolution shall not be filed with the Commission, but shall be served as follows, and on other persons as the Commission deems appropriate:
(1) A draft resolution disposing of an advice letter shall be served on the utility that proposed the advice letter, on any person who served a protest or response to the advice letter, and any person whose name and interest in the relief sought appears on the face of the advice letter (as where the advice letter seeks approval of a contract or deviation for the benefit of such person);
(2) A draft resolution disposing of a request for disclosure of documents in the Commission's possession shall be served on (A) the person who requested the disclosure, (B) any Commission regulate about which information protected by Public Utilities Code Section 583 would be disclosed if the request were granted, and (C) any person (whether or not a Commission regulate) who, pursuant to protective order, had submitted information to the Commission, which information would be disclosed if the request were granted;
(3) A draft resolution disposing of one or more requests for motor carrier operating authority shall be served on any person whose request would be denied, in whole or part, and any person protesting a request, regardless of whether the resolution would sustain the protest;
(4) A draft resolution establishing a rule or setting a fee schedule for a class of Commission-regulated entities shall be served on any person providing written comment solicited by Commission staff (e.g., at a workshop or by letter) for purposes of preparing the draft resolution.
Note: Authority cited: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code; and Section 2, Article XII, California Constitution. Reference: Sections 311(d), 311(f), 1701.1, 1701.3 and 1701.4, Public Utilities Code.
(a) Parties may file comments on the proposed or alternate decision within 20 days of the date of its service on the parties.
(b) Except in general rate cases, major plant addition proceedings, and major generic investigations, comments shall be limited to 15 pages in length. Comments in general rate cases, major plant addition proceedings, and major generic investigations shall not exceed 25 pages. Comments shall include a subject index listing the recommended changes to the proposed or alternate decision, a table of authorities and an appendix setting forth proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. The subject index, table of authorities, and appendix do not count against the page limit.
(c) Comments shall focus on factual, legal or technical errors in the proposed or alternate decision and in citing such errors shall make specific references to the record or applicable law. Comments which fail to do so will be accorded no weight. Comments proposing specific changes to the proposed or alternate decision shall include supporting findings of fact and conclusions of law.
(d) Replies to comments may be filed within five days after the last day for filing comments and shall be limited to identifying misrepresentations of law, fact or condition of the record contained in the comments of other parties. Replies shall not exceed five pages in length.
Note: Authority cited: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code; and Section 2, Article XII, California Constitution. Reference: Section 311(d), Public Utilities Code.
(a) Any party may file an appeal of the presiding officer's decision within 30 days of the date the decision is served.
(b) Any Commissioner may request review of the presiding officer's decision by filing a request for review within 30 days of the date the decision is served.
(c) Appeals and requests for review shall set forth specifically the grounds on which the appellant or requestor believes the presiding officer's decision to be unlawful or erroneous. Vague assertions as to the record or the law, without citation, may be accorded little weight.
(d) Any party may file its response no later than 15 days after the date the appeal or request for review was filed. In cases of multiple appeals or requests for review, the response may be to all such filings and may be filed 15 days after the last such appeal or request for review was filed. Replies to responses are not permitted. The Commission is not obligated to withhold a decision on an appeal or request for review to allow time for responses to be filed.
Note: Authority cited: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code. Reference: Sections 1701.2(a) and (c), Public Utilities Code.
Any person may comment on a draft or alternate resolution by serving (but not filing) comments on the director of the Commission division that issued the draft resolution by no later than ten days before the Commission meeting when the draft or alternate resolution is first scheduled for consideration (as indicated on the first page of the draft or alternate resolution).
Comments shall be concurrently served on all Commissioners, the Chief Administrative Law Judge, the General Counsel, and either (a) all persons shown on the service list appended to the draft or alternate resolution, if any, or (b) in accordance with the instructions accompanying the notice of the resolution as an agenda item in the Commission's Daily Calendar.
Note: Authority cited: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code; and Section 2, Article XII, California Constitution. Reference: Sections 311(e) and 311(g), Public Utilities Code.
(a) In an unforeseen emergency situation, the Commission may reduce or waive the period for public review and comment on proposed decision, draft resolutions, and alternates. "Unforeseen emergency situation" means a matter that requires action or a decision by the Commission more quickly than would be permitted if advance publication were made on the regular meeting agenda. Examples include, but are not limited to:
(1) Activities that severely impair or threaten to severely impair public health or safety.
(2) Crippling disasters that severely impair public health or safety.
(3) Administrative disciplinary matters, including, but not limited to, consideration of proposed decisions and stipulations, and pending litigation, that require immediate attention.
(4) Consideration of applications for licenses or certificates for which a decision must be made in less than ten days.
(5) Consideration of proposed legislation that requires immediate attention due to legislative action that may be taken before the next regularly scheduled Commission meeting, or due to time limitations imposed by law.
(6) Requests for relief based on extraordinary conditions in which time is of the essence.
(7) Deadlines for Commission action imposed by legislative bodies, courts, other administrative bodies or tribunals, the office of the Governor, or a legislator.
(8) Unusual matters that cannot be disposed of by normal procedures if the duties of the Commission are to be fulfilled.
A rate increase is not an unforeseen emergency situation.
(b) The Commission may reduce or waive the period for public review and comment on proposed decisions, draft resolutions and alternates, where all the parties so stipulate.
(c) In the following circumstances, the Commission may reduce or waive the period for public review and comment on draft resolutions and proposed decisions, and may reduce but not waive the period for public review and comment on alternates to them:
(1) in a matter where temporary injunctive relief is under consideration.
(2) in an uncontested matter where the decision grants the relief requested.
(3) for a decision on a request for review of the presiding officer's decision in an adjudicatory proceeding.
(4) for a decision extending the deadline for resolving adjudicatory proceedings (Public Utilities Code Section 1701.2(d)) or for resolving the issues raised in the scoping memo in a ratesetting or quasi-legislative proceeding (Public Utilities Code Section 1701.5).
(5) for a decision under the state arbitration provisions of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996.
(6) for a decision on a request for compensation pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 1801 et seq.
(7) for a decision authorizing disclosure of documents in the Commission's possession when such disclosure is pursuant to subpoena.
(8) for a decision under a federal or California statute (such as the California Environmental Quality Act or the Administrative Procedure Act) that both makes comprehensive provision for public review and comment in the decision-making process and sets a deadline from initiation of the proceeding within which the Commission must resolve the proceeding.
(9) for a decision in a proceeding in which no hearings were conducted where the Commission determines, on the motion of a party or on its own motion, that public necessity requires reduction or waiver of the 30-day period for public review and comment. For purposes of this subsection, "public necessity" refers to circumstances in which the public interest in the Commission adopting a decision before expiration of the 30-day review and comment period clearly outweighs the public interest in having the full 30-day period for review and comment. "Public necessity" includes, without limitation, circumstances where failure to adopt a decision before expiration of the 30-day review and comment period would place the Commission or a Commission regulate in violation of applicable law, or where such failure would cause significant harm to public health or welfare. When acting pursuant to this subsection, the Commission will provide such reduced period for public review and comment as is consistent with the public necessity requiring reduction or waiver.
Note: Authority cited: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code; and Section 2, Article XII, California Constitution. Reference: Sections 306(b), 311(e), 311(g), 1701.2(d) and 1701.5, Public Utilities Code; and Section 11125.5, Government Code.
(a) No public review or comment is required for (1) a resolution on an advice letter filing or decision on an uncontested matter where the filing or matter pertains solely to one or more water corporations as defined in Public Utilities Code Section 241, (2) an order instituting investigation or rulemaking, (3) a categorization resolution under Public Utilities Code Sections 1701.1 through 1701.4, or (4) an order, including a decision on an appeal from the presiding officer's decision in an adjudicatory proceeding, that the Commission is authorized by law to consider in executive session.
(b) Except to the extent that the Commission finds it is required by the public interest in a particular case, this article does not apply to the decision of the assigned Administrative Law Judge in a complaint under the expedited complaint procedure.
Note: Authority cited: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code; and Section 2, Article XII, California Constitution. Reference: Sections 311(f) and 1702.1, Public Utilities Code.