CCC's motion seeks to strike portions of SDG&E's prepared testimony that address recommendations presented in the Energy Division workshop report. CCC seeks to strike the testimony by SDG&E that specifically sets forth SDG&E's position on a line loss multiplier proposed by the Energy Division workshop facilitator, discussed at the workshop, and described in the workshop report. CCC argues that it would be inconsistent to allow SDG&E to present this testimony when Commissioner Neeper and I struck workshop-related testimony by Caithness. The portion of Caithness' testimony that was stricken dealt with general critiques about the workshop focus and did not address Caithness' position regarding recommendations set forth in the workshop report. General comments about the workshop and the report were properly made during the workshop. Unlike Caithness' stricken testimony, SDG&E's testimony sets forth the company's position on a specific proposal made by the Energy Division workshop facilitator during the workshop and described in the workshop report. This testimony is appropriate as we consider different line loss methodologies. Therefore, CCC's motion is denied.