CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
TELECOMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
December 21, 2001
Prepared by Telecommunications Division:
Michael Amato Jack Leutza
Robert Benjamin Michaela Pangilinan
Mary Jo Borak Craig Stevens
Cherrie Conner Karen Watts-Zagha
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page #
CHAPTER ONE: OVERVIEW OF NUMBERING 99
A. Inefficient Use and Increasing Demand 99
B. 530 History and CPUC Decisions 1010
1. Monthly Lottery Allocates Prefixes 1111
C. CPUC Efforts to Resolve Area Code Proliferation 1212
2. Improved Number Inventory Management 1414
CHAPTER TWO: 5.75 MILLION UNUSED NUMBERS IN THE 530 AREA CODE.....19
A. The Scope of the Utilization Study 1919
1. Distribution Statistics of Prefixes 1919
3. Non-Reporting Companies 2020
B. Numbers Available in the 530 Area Code 2020
1. 5.75 Million Numbers Available 2020
C. Analysis of Available Numbers 2323
1. Analysis of Wireline Carriers' Contamination Rates 2323
2. Analysis of Wireless Carriers' Contamination Rate 2828
3. Potential Block Contamination Abuses 3030
4. Reclamation of Prefixes 3131
D. Analysis of 2.01 Million "Unavailable" Numbers 3333
1. 1.65 Million Assigned Numbers 3434
2. Reserved Numbers Are a Potential Source of Additional Numbers 3838
3. Administrative Numbers are a Potential Source of Additional Numbers 3939
CHAPTER THREE: NUMBER POOLING AND OTHER NUMBER CONSERVATION MEASURES 4545
1. More Accurate Forecasting Will Improve Number Pooling 4646
C. Lack of Local Number Portability Stands as a Key Barrier to Pooling 4747
D. Unassigned Number Porting 4848
E. Consolidation of Rate Centers to Maximize Number Use 5050
F. Sharing Prefixes May Yield More Efficient Number Use 5252
CONCLUSION.............................................................................................53
APPENDICES A-IEXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Like much of the country, California currently is experiencing a numbering crisis. From 1947 to January 1997, the number of area codes in this state increased gradually from 3 to 13. During the next three years, however, the number of area codes in California nearly doubled. By the end of 1999, California had 25 area codes statewide. The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) recently implemented several measures intended to ensure efficient use of telephone numbers. Without the implementation of major conservation measures, the telecommunications industry had plans underway to add 22 more area codes in California by the end of 2003, resulting in a statewide total of 47 area codes.
This study recounts the history of the 530 area code, from its creation in 1997 when it was geographically split from the 916 area code. Today, the 530 area code serves Northeastern California, north of Sacramento to the Oregon border, and east of the Coast Range to the Nevada border. Portions of 530 are located within the Sacramento and Vallejo Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA). This report should be viewed in a broader context than the facts pertaining solely to the 530 area code. The report evaluates the status of number availability in the 530 area code, and discusses the various state and federal policies which govern number use in California and nationwide. In addition, the report analyzes number use by carrier category and identifies what measures the CPUC can employ in the 530 and other area codes to improve efficiency of number use in order to avoid prematurely opening new area codes. Data is self-reported by the companies; the CPUC staff has not audited any 530 utilization data submitted for this study and report.
The utilization study sheds new light on the numbering crisis in the 530 area code. The data reveals that despite increasing demand for numbers, the 530 area code is not fully utilized. The study found that of the 7.76 million useable numbers in the 530 area code, approximately 5.75 million, or 74%, presently are not in use. The data further establishes that the 530 area code possesses considerable room for growth, and thus, aggressive measures such as splits or overlays are not yet warranted in the 530 area code. The report further urges the CPUC to seek from the FCC authority to implement Unassigned Number Porting (UNP) as a means to more efficiently use numbers still available in the 530 area code.
This report is filed in compliance with CPUC Decision (D.) 99-12-051, and with AB 406, enacted by the California Legislature in the 1999 legislative session. (Chapter 99-809, 1999.) AB 406, codified as Public Utilities Code Section 7937, requires the CPUC to obtain historical telephone number use data from every telecommunications company in California. The CPUC's Telecommunications Division (TD) first obtained and analyzed data from the 310 area code in Los Angeles late in 1999, and produced a utilization report on the 310 area code in March 2000. In November 2000, TD completed utilization reports covering the 415, 510, 818, and 909 area codes, and in March 2001 TD completed utilization reports covering the 408, 619, 650, and 714 area codes. TD released another four utilization reports in May 2001 covering the 323, 562, 916, and 925 area codes, in July released reports on the 626, 707, 805, and 949, and in October released reports on the 209, 213, 760, and 858 area codes. This report on the 530 area code continues TD's analysis covering specific area code number utilization levels.