(a) This rule governs motion practice in Commission proceedings, except as otherwise provided in these rules or by statute, Commission order, decision or resolution.
(b) A motion is a request for the Commission or the administrative law judge to take a specific action related to a proceeding before the Commission.
(c) A motion may be made at any time during the pendency of a proceeding by any party to the proceeding. In appropriate circumstances, a motion may also be made by a person or entity who is not a party:
(1) if the person or entity states an intent to become a party to the proceeding at the next opportunity;
(2) if the motion relates to a special appearance or limited participation in the proceeding, e.g., a motion to quash; or
(3) with the permission of the administrative law judge.
(d) Written motions must be filed and served and must comply with Rules 2, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, and 2.5. The administrative law judge may permit an oral motion to be made during a hearing or conference.
(e) A motion must concisely state the facts and law supporting the motion and the specific relief or ruling requested.
(f) Responses to written motions must be filed and served within 15 days of the date that the motion was served, unless the administrative law judge sets a different date. Written responses must comply with Rules 2, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, and 2.5. Responses to oral motions may be made as permitted by the administrative law judge.
(g) With the permission of the administrative law judge, the moving party may reply to responses to the motion. Written replies must be filed and served within 10 days of the last day for filing responses under Rule 45(f), unless the administrative law judge sets a different date. Written replies must comply with Rules 2, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, and 2.5. A written reply must state in the opening paragraph that the administrative law judge has authorized its filing and must state the date and the manner in which the authorization was given (i.e., in writing, by telephone conversation, etc.).
(h) Nothing in this rule prevents the Commission or the administrative law judge from ruling on a motion before responses or replies are filed.
(i) In the interests of justice and efficiency, the Commission, the assigned Commissioner, or the administrative law judge may authorize or direct deviations from the requirements of this rule.
Note: Authority cited: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code; and Section 2, Article XII, California Constitution.
Petitions are functionally equivalent to written motions. The requirements of Rule 45 apply to petitions, except when these rules provide different or more specific requirements for certain types of petitions. (See Rule 47 on petitions for modification, Rule 53 on petitions to intervene, and Rule 84 on petitions to set aside submission.)
Note: Authority cited: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code; and Section 2, Article XII, California Constitution.
(a) A petition for modification asks the Commission to make changes to the text of an issued decision. Filing a petition for modification does not stay the effectiveness of the decision or preserve the party's appellate rights; an application for rehearing (see Article 21) is the vehicle to request rehearing and preserve a party's appellate rights.
(b) A petition for modification must concisely state the justification for the requested relief and must propose specific wording to carry out all requested modifications to the decision. Any factual allegations must be supported with specific citations to the record in the proceeding or to matters that may be officially noticed (Rule 73). Allegations of new or changed facts must be supported by an appropriate declaration or affidavit.
(c) A petition for modification must be filed and served on all parties to the proceeding or proceedings in which the decision proposed to be modified was made. The petition must comply with Rules 2, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, and 2.5. If more than one year has elapsed since the effective date of the decision (see subsection (d)), the administrative law judge may direct the petitioner to serve the petition on other or additional persons or entities.
(d) Except as provided in this subsection, a petition for modification must be filed and served within one year of the effective date of the decision proposed to be modified. If more than one year has elapsed, the petition must also explain why the petition could not have been presented within one year of the effective date of the decision. If the Commission determines that the late submission has not been justified, it may on that ground issue a summary denial of the petition.
(e) If the petitioner is not a party to the proceeding in which the decision proposed to be modified was issued, the petition must state specifically how the petitioner is affected by the decision and why the petitioner did not participate in the proceeding earlier. A separate petition to intervene (see Article 14) is not required. The petitioner will become a party to the proceeding for the purpose of resolving the petition.
(f) Responses to petitions for modification must be filed and served within 30 days of the date that the petition was served, unless the administrative law judge sets a different date. Responses must be served on the petitioner and on all parties who were served with the petition and must comply with the requirements of Rules 2, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, and 2.5.
(g) With the permission of the administrative law judge, the petitioner may reply to responses to the petition. Replies must be filed and served within 10 days of the last day for filing responses under subsection (f), unless the administrative law judge sets a different date. Replies must comply with Rules 2, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, and 2.5. A reply must state in the opening paragraph that the administrative law judge has authorized its filing and must state the date and the manner in which the authorization was given (i.e., in writing, by telephone conversation, etc.).
(h) In response to a petition for modification, the Commission may modify the decision as requested, modify the affected portion of the decision in some other way consistent with the requested modification, set the matter for further hearings or briefing, summarily deny the petition on the ground that the Commission is not persuaded to modify the decision, or take other appropriate action.
(i) Unless otherwise ordered by the Commission, the filing of a petition for modification does not stay or excuse compliance with the order of the decision proposed to be modified. The decision remains in effect until the effective date of any decision modifying the decision.
(j) Correction of obvious typographical errors or omissions in Commission decisions may be requested by letter to the Executive Director, with a copy sent at the same time to all parties to the proceeding.
Note: Authority cited: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code; and Section 2, Article XII, California Constitution.
(a) Requests for extension of time limits established in these rules or in a ruling of an administrative law judge or commissioner may be made orally or by letter to the administrative law judge. If other parties to the proceeding are affected by the extension, the party requesting the extension must first make a good-faith effort to ask such parties to agree to the extension. The party requesting the extension must report the results of this effort when it makes its request. If the extension is granted, the administrative law judge will require the party requesting the extension to notify all other parties to the proceeding of the extension, and the party must state in the opening paragraph of the document that the administrative law judge has authorized the extension. In the alternative, the administrative law judge may confirm the extension in a written ruling served on all parties or an oral ruling delivered on the record of the proceeding. No extensions will be granted of time requirements established by statute, unless the statute permits extension or waiver of the requirement.
(b) Requests for extension of time to comply with a Commission decision or order may be made by letter to the Executive Director, with a copy sent at the same time to all parties to the proceeding. The letter, or a facsimile of the letter, must be received by the Executive Director at least three business days before the existing date for compliance. If the extension is granted, the party requesting the extension must promptly inform all parties to the proceeding of the Executive Director's decision and must state in the opening paragraph of the document that the Executive Director has authorized the extension.
Note: Authority cited: Section 1701, Public Utilities Code; and Section 2, Article XII, California Constitution.