STATE OF CALIFORNIA ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
505 VAN NESS AVENUE
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3298
Georgi Dimitrov Nikolov and Hristiyan Georgiev Dimitrov, doing business as Western Eagle Shuttle and Marin Airport Transportation, |
||
Complainants, |
||
vs. |
Case No.06-05-010 | |
Marin Door to Door, Inc., doing business as Marin Door to Door, and North Bay Airport Express Shuttle, Inc., doing business as Marin County Airport Express. |
Certified Mail 7003 3110 0002 3114 1315 (Marin Door to Door, Inc., doing business as Marin Door to Door) | |
7003 3110 0002 3114 1322 (North Bay Airport Express Shuttle, Inc., doing business as Marin County Airport Express) | ||
Defendants. |
||
INSTRUCTIONS TO ANSWER
Marin Door to Door, Inc.
DBA: Marin Door to Door
c/o Beysim O. Yakuboff, President
5 Mitchell Boulevard, Suite 1
San Rafael, CA 94901
North Bay Airport Express Shuttle, Inc.
DBA: Marin County Airport Express
c/o Gulsen M. Yakubova
5 Mitchell Boulevard, Suite 1
San Rafael, CA 94901
You are hereby notified that the above-entitled complaint has been filed against you as defendant. You are directed to answer the complaint in writing within 30 days after today unless time is modified pursuant to Rule 13 of the Commission's "Rules of Practice and Procedure." The answer shall be in compliance with Rule 6(b)(2) and Rule 13.1 of these rules. Your answer shall be sent to California Public Utilities Commission, Attn.: Docket Office, 505 Van Ness Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102.
This matter has been assigned to Commissioner John Bohn and Administrative Law Judge A. Kirk McKenzie. It has been determined that the complaint will be categorized as Adjudicatory. A hearing will be scheduled by the assigned Administrative Law Judge, unless the matter is otherwise resolved by the parties.
Dated at San Francisco, California this 19th day of May, 2006.
/s/ ANGELA K. MINKIN
by Martin Nakahara |
Angela K. Minkin |
Chief Administrative Law Judge |
AM/pcg
Enclosures: Complaint and Rules 13 & 13.1
cc: Complainant
cc via email only, w/o copy of encls.: Cmmr. Bohn and ALJ McKenzie
13. (Rule 13) Time for Answers.
Within thirty days after the date of service of the complaint, the defendant shall answer the complaint. The Commission, the Chief Administrative Law Judge, or the presiding officer may require the filing of an answer within a shorter time.
Requests for an extension of time to answer shall be directed to the Chief Administrative Law Judge, or the presiding officer, in writing, and a copy shall be served on all parties. The request shall indicate complainant's acquiescence to the extension of time or the measures taken by defendant in his unsuccessful effort to obtain acquiescence. The Chief Administrative Law Judge, or the presiding officer, shall notify the parties of his ruling.
If an amendment to a complaint is filed before receipt of the answer, the defendant's time to answer the complaint shall be thirty days from the date of service of the amendment, unless otherwise directed. Amendments to a complaint made subsequent to the filing of an answer need not be answered.
