| Word Document PDF Document |
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
505 VAN NESS AVENUE
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3298
Brackenhoff Management Group, California Home for the Aged Deaf, Canaan Housing Corporation, Menorah Housing Foundation, Retirement Housing Foundation, The East Los Angeles Community Union, and Upward Bound, |
||
Complainants, |
||
vs. |
Case No. 06-09-011 | |
Southern California Gas Company, |
Certified Mail | |
Defendant. |
7004 1350 0003 6131 5601 | |
INSTRUCTIONS TO ANSWER
Southern California Gas Company
Attn.: Sid Newsom
555 West Fifth Street
Los Angeles, CA 90013-1011
You are hereby notified that the above-entitled complaint has been filed against you as defendant. You are directed to answer the complaint in writing within 30 days after today. The answer shall be in compliance with Rule 4.4 the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. Your answer shall be sent to California Public Utilities Commission, Attn.: Docket Office, 505 Van Ness Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102.
This matter has been assigned to Commissioner Dian M. Grueneich and Administrative Law Judge Jacqueline A. Reed. It has been determined that the complaint will be categorized as Adjudicatory. A hearing will be scheduled by the assigned Administrative Law Judge, unless the matter is otherwise resolved by the parties.
Dated at San Francisco, California this 5th day of October, 2006.
/ s / ANGELA K. MINKIN |
Angela K. Minkin |
Chief Administrative Law Judge |
AM/mak
Enclosures: Complaint and Rules 4.4
cc: Paul Kerkorian, Representative of Complainants
cc via email only, w/o copy of encls.: Cmmr. Grueneich and ALJ Reed
4.4. (Rule 4.4) Answers
The answer must admit or deny each material allegation in the complaint and shall set forth any new matter constituting a defense. Its purpose is to fully advise the complainant and the Commission of the nature of the defense. At least one of the defendants filing an answer must verify it, but if more than one answer is filed in response to a complaint against multiple defendants, each answer must be separately verified. (See Rule 1.11.)
The answer should also set forth any defects in the complaint which require amendment or clarification. Failure to indicate jurisdictional defects does not waive these defects and shall not prevent a motion to dismiss made thereafter.
The answer must state any comments or objections regarding the complainant's statement on the need for hearing, issues to be considered, and proposed schedule. The proposed schedule shall be consistent with the categorization of the proceeding, including a deadline for resolving the proceeding within 12 months or less (adjudicatory proceeding) or 18 months or less (ratesetting or quasi-legislative proceeding). (See Article 7.)
Answers must include the full name, address, and telephone number of defendant and the defendant's attorney, if any, and indicate service on all complainants.