Word Document PDF Document |
STATE OF CALIFORNIA GRAY DAVIS, Governor
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
505 VAN NESS AVENUE
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3298
March 7, 2002 Alternate Order to H-16
From 2/21/2002 Agenda
TO: PARTIES OF RECORD IN CASE 98-06-016
Enclosed is the Alternate Order of Commissioner Wood to the Draft Decision of Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Bushey previously mailed to you. This item is on the Commission's agenda for March 21, 2002.
As set forth in Rule 77.6, parties to the proceeding may file comments on the enclosed alternate at least seven days before the Commission meeting or no later than March 14, 2002. Reply comments should be served by March 18, 2002. An original and four copies of the comments and reply comments with a certificate of service shall be filed with the Commission's Docket Office and copies shall be served on all parties on the same day of filing. The Commissioners and ALJ shall be served separately by overnight service.
/s/ LYNN T. CAREW by PSW
Lynn T. Carew, Chief
Administrative Law Judge
LTC:jac
Enclosure
COM/CXW/mnt DRAFT ALTERNATE ORDER TO H-16 _______ 7/12/2001
From 2/21/2002 Agenda
Decision ALTERNATE ORDER OF COMMISSIONER WOOD
(Mailed 3/7/2002)
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
The Utility Consumers' Action Network (UCAN), Complainant, vs. MCI Metro Access Transmission Services (MCI Metro), Inc., Defendants. |
Case 98-06-016 (Filed June 2, 1998) |
In this decision, the Commission finds that that MCI Metro Access Transmission Services (MCI Metro) has resolved the billing errors1 adjudicated in this proceeding, and that these errors support a fine of $420,000.
1 The billing errors resolved in this proceeding are limited to the errors related to local exchange service provided by MCI Metro that are addressed in this decision. This decision does not address any billing or service transfer issues relating to long distance service provided by any MCI Metro affiliate. The problem of customers continuing to be billed after disconnection was expressly excluded from this proceeding per the Assigned ALJ's ruling of January 27, 2000, and therefore is not adjudicated in this decision.