3. Outstanding Procedural Matters

On June 14, 2000, CCC filed a motion to set aside submission in order to enter into evidence certain responses to data requests related to line losses. There was no comment on the motion. CCC's motion is granted. Appendix A to the June 14 motion will be marked as Exhibit 29 and will be received into evidence as of June 14, 2000.

On June 14, 2000, SCE filed a motion to strike portions of the Opening Briefs of Caithness, EWC, and FPL. EWC responded on June 16, FPL responded on June 29, Caithness responded on June 28. The material SCE seeks to strike is based on the specific record, general facts, or is argument that is appropriately within the scope of briefs. SCE's motion to strike is denied.

On June 21, 2000, CCC filed a motion to strike portions of SCE's Opening Brief. SCE responded on June 26. CCC argues that two alternative proposals offered by SCE on brief are not record-based, are untested by cross-examination and do not have comparative pricing information provided. SCE counters that its alternative proposals are "logical extension[s]" of proposals by other parties, with basis in the record. We agree with SCE; the motion to strike of CCC is denied.