Word Document PDF Document |
STATE OF CALIFORNIA GRAY DAVIS, Governor
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
505 VAN NESS AVENUE
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3298
March 4, 2003 Agenda ID #1865
TO: PARTIES OF RECORD IN RULEMAKING 01-08-028
This is the draft decision of Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Malcolm. It will not appear on the Commission's agenda for at least 30 days after the date it is mailed. The Commission may act then, or it may postpone action until later.
When the Commission acts on the draft decision, it may adopt all or part of it as written, amend or modify it, or set it aside and prepare its own decision. Only when the Commission acts does the decision become binding on the parties.
Parties to the proceeding may file comments on the draft decision as provided in Article 19 of the Commission's "Rules of Practice and Procedure." These rules are accessible on the Commission's website at http://www.cpuc.ca.gov. Pursuant to Rule 77.3 opening comments shall not exceed 15 pages. Finally, comments must be served separately on the ALJ and the assigned Commissioner, and for that purpose I suggest hand delivery, overnight mail, or other expeditious method of service.
/s/ ANGELA K. MINKIN
Angela K. Minkin, Chief
Administrative Law Judge
ANG:sid
Attachment
ALJ/KIM/sid DRAFT Agenda ID #1865
Quasi-Legislative
Decision DRAFT DECISION OF ALJ MALCOLM (Mailed 3/4/2003)
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Order Instituting Rulemaking to Examine the Commission's Future Energy Efficiency Policies, Administration and Programs. |
Rulemaking 01-08-028 (Filed August 23, 2001) |
INTERIM OPINION ON 2003 STATEWIDE/UTILITY LOCAL
ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAMS AND OTHER STUDIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page
INTERIM OPINION ON 2003 STATEWIDE/UTILITY LOCAL
ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAMS AND OTHER STUDIES 2
I. Summary 2
II. Background 4
III. 2003 Utility Statewide and Local Programs 5
IV. PG&E and the City of San Francisco's Pilot Program Proposal 7
V. Statewide Marketing and Outreach Programs 10
A. Proposals and Criteria for their Consideration 10
B. The Efficiency Partnership Proposal for Funding a Nonprofit Corporation 12
C. Marketing and Outreach Program Proposals 15
D. Program Administration of Marketing and Outreach Programs 16
VI. Measurement and Verification of Programs and Projects 18
A. 1998-2002 PGC Financial Audit, Program Evaluation, and Quality Assessment 19
B. 2003 Utility Statewide Program Measurement and Verification 19
C. 2003 Utility Local Program Measurement and Verification 20
D. Avoided Cost and Externality Update 20
E. Energy Efficiency Program Groupware Application 21
VII. Accounting and Administration 22
A. Cost Accountability and Budget Authority 22
B. Information and Training Programs-Accountability 23
C. Shifting of Funds 23
D. Commission Cost Reimbursement 24
VIII. Comments on Draft Decision 24
IX. Assignment of Proceeding 24
Findings of Fact 25
Conclusions of Law 26
INTERIM ORDER 28
ATTACHMENT 1 - Program Budgets and Energy Savings Targets
ATTACHMENT 2 - Program Descriptions
ATTACHMENT 3 - Statewide Marketing/Outreach Program Proposals Rejected
INTERIM OPINION ON 2003 STATEWIDE/UTILITY LOCAL