Although the Commission's concerns over congestion on Path 15 during 2000 and 2001 were expressed in terms of "system reliability" problems, it became clear during the course of this proceeding that Path 15 upgrades are not needed to meet the reliability criteria as defined by the ISO, the Western Systems Coordinating Council and the North American Electric Reliability Council. The ISO testified that the project is not required for reliability purposes, and that it does not plan to conduct any further reliability studies regarding Path 15.8 Therefore, the scope of our investigation focuses on the economic need for the project. More specifically, we examine the economics of the project on a "stand alone" basis-i.e., without considering the manner in which PG&E and other entities will participate in the project.
8 Reporter's Transcript (RT), Vol. 6, p. 538, 576, 589.