Word Document PDF Document |
STATE OF CALIFORNIA GRAY DAVIS, Governor
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
505 VAN NESS AVENUE
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3298
October 14, 2003 Agenda ID #2881
Ratesetting
TO: PARTIES OF RECORD IN APPLICATION 02-02-012
This is the proposed decision of Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) DeBerry, previously designated as the principal hearing officer in this proceeding. It will not appear on the Commission's agenda for at least 30 days after the date it is mailed. This matter was categorized as ratesetting and is subject to Pub. Util. Code § 1701.3(c). Pursuant to Resolution ALJ-180, a Ratesetting Deliberative Meeting to consider this matter may be held upon the request of any Commissioner. If that occurs, the Commission will prepare and mail an agenda for the Ratesetting Deliberative Meeting 10 days before hand, and will advise the parties of this fact, and of the related ex parte communications prohibition period.
The Commission may act at the regular meeting, or it may postpone action until later. If action is postponed, the Commission will announce whether and when there will be a further prohibition on communications.
When the Commission acts on the proposed decision, it may adopt all or part of it as written, amend or modify it, or set it aside and prepare its own decision. Only when the Commission acts does the decision become binding on the parties.
Parties to the proceeding may file comments on the proposed decision as provided in Article 19 of the Commission's "Rules of Practice and Procedure." These rules are accessible on the Commission's website at http://www.cpuc.ca.gov. Pursuant to Rule 77.3 opening comments shall not exceed 15 pages. Finally, comments must be served separately on the ALJ and the assigned Commissioner, and for that purpose I suggest hand delivery, overnight mail, or other expeditious method of service.
/s/ Angela K. Minkin
Angela K. Minkin, Chief
Administrative Law Judge
ANG:avs
ALJ/BMD/avs DRAFT Agenda ID #2881
Ratesetting
Decision PROPOSED DECISION OF ALJ DeBERRY (Mailed 10/14/2003)
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of the Application of Southwest Gas Corporation for Authority to Increase Rates in San Bernardino, Placer, El Dorado, and Nevada Counties, California. |
Application 02-02-012 (Filed February 13, 2002) |
OPINION REGARDING PROPOSED
GENERAL RATE INCREASE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Pages
OPINION REGARDING PROPOSED GENERAL RATE INCREASES 22
5.2. Labor Loading (pensions, benefits, and payroll taxes) 1818
5.3. Four-Factor Cost Allocation 1919
5.4. Labor and Non-Labor Escalation 1919
5.5. Operating and Maintenance Expenses (Southern and
Northern California Divisions) 2020
5.6. Account 813 Other Gas Supply Expenses
(Southern and Northern California) 2222
5.7. Account 881 Rents (Southern and Northern California) 2222
5.8. Gas Distribution Expenses except Gas Supply and
Rents Expenses (Northern California) 2222
5.9. Customer Accounts Expenses - Accounts 901, 902, 903,
and 905 (Southern California) 2424
5.9.2. Customer Accounts Expenses, Excluding Account 902, Meter Reading, and Account 904, Uncollectibles (Northern California) 2525
5.9.3. Account 902 - Meter Reading 2626
5.9.4. Account 904 - Uncollectible Expense 2626
5.9.5. Customer Service and Information Expenses (Accounts 908 and 909) 2727
5.10. Sales Expenses (Accounts 912 and 913) 2828
5.11. Administrative and General Expenses - System Wide 2828
Title Pages
5.12. Account 925 Injuries and Damages, Liability
Insurance and Workers' Compensation 3232
7.1. Distribution Plant-Pipeline Replacement Project 4545
7.4. Pipeline Replacement Program (Northern California) 5151
Title Pages
13. Gas Procurement Costs 6464
15. Comments on Proposed Decision 7777
APPENDIX A Operating Expenses
APPENDIX B Southern California Gas Pipeline Replacement Program
APPENDIX C Results of Operation - Southern California
APPENDIX D Results of Operation - Northern California
OPINION REGARDING PROPOSED
GENERAL RATE INCREASES
This decision adopts 2003 general rate increases of approximately $3.8 million each for Southwest Gas Corporation's Southern and Northern California Divisions. In order to minimize the impact on rates, these revenue requirement increases will be phased in during 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006. As a result, 80% of the increase will be included in rates for 2003; 10% in 2004; 5% in 2005 and 5% in 2006. The phase-in of these increases recognizes the current economic climate, and the ability of customers to bear both these increases and potential increases in the cost of gas.
The total increases in revenue requirements represent an increase of approximately 9.6 % over base rates, and 4.6% over total operating revenue for Southern California, and 43.2 % over base rates, and 17.9% over total operating revenue for Northern California. The adopted increases represent approximately 66% of Southwest's requested increase in Southern California, and 86% of the requested increase in Northern California.1 This decision also provides for attrition increases in Southern and Northern California in 2004, 2005 and 2006, that protect against labor and non-labor inflation, and inclusion of the Truckee Operational Center in Southwest's Northern California 2004 attrition year revenue requirements. Southwest is also authorized to amortize amounts currently recorded in the Revenue Recovery Shortfall Memorandum Account in rates for 2003 and 2004. In addition, this decision adopts a revenue balancing account that protects ratepayers against over-collections, and Southwest against under-collections due to differences between forecasted sales and actual sales.
These rate increases are the first General Rate Increases authorized for Southwest since its last General Rate Case in 1995, and are a result of increasing costs for both labor and non-labor expenses, and greater plant investment, that have occurred during the last eight years. The adopted revenue requirements are based on the use of a 2003 test year, and an overall rate of return of 9.17% on Southwest's rate base investment. The adopted revenue requirements provide for an accelerated pipeline replacement program in Southern California to reduce pipeline leak rates and increase safety. As explained in our opinion, we have not adopted recommendations by other parties for a refund of postretirement benefits other than pensions, nor have we adopted a refund of gas purchase costs that occurred in winter 2000-2001. Finally, we defer certain issues regarding other investments, and the future of the trust account for funding future retiree's benefits to Southwest's next general rate case.
1 During the proceeding, Southwest reduced its requested revenue requirement increases from $8.4 to $5.7 million in Southern California, and from $5.5 million to $4.4 million in Northern California.