Assignment of Proceeding
Geoffrey Brown is the Assigned Commissioner and Douglas M. Long is the assigned ALJ in this proceeding.
1. The Commission did not adopt a specific ratemaking forecast for the SONGS costs billed by Edison to SDG&E in D.04-07-022, the Edison general rate case where the forecast was litigated. SDG&E's Ex. 169 does not persuasively demonstrate the correct forecast for SDG&E's share of SONGS costs.
2. D.04-12-015, which adopted SDG&E's test year 2004 revenue requirement, omitted an allowance for Results Sharing costs in the SONGS costs billed by Edison to SDG&E. After correcting SDG&E's forecast for the adjustment made to Edison's forecast in D.04-07-022, the correct forecast is $2.179 million that should have been included in test year revenue requirements.
3. D.04-12-015 omitted an allowance for PBOPs costs in the SONGS costs billed by Edison to SDG&E. The correct forecast is $0.683 million that should have been included in test year revenue requirements.
4. D.04-12-015 omitted an allowance for Contractual Overheads in the SONGS costs billed by Edison to SDG&E. The correct forecast is $2.538 million that should have been included in test year revenue requirements.
5. The attrition year revenue requirement for 2005 should be adjusted to reflect the shortfall as a result of the stated omissions in the test year 2004 revenue requirement.
1. Exs. 261, 408 and 414, from A.02-05-004, can be received in evidence by reference pursuant to Rule 72.
2. SDG&E met its burden to prove, with clear and convincing evidence, that the allowance for Results Sharing costs in the SONGS costs billed by Edison to SDG&E was omitted from D.04-12-015.
3. SDG&E met its burden to prove, with clear and convincing evidence, an allowance for PBOPs costs in the SONGS costs billed by Edison to SDG&E was omitted from D,04-12-015.
4. SDG&E met its burden to prove, with clear and convincing evidence, that an allowance for Contractual Overheads costs in the SONGS costs billed by Edison to SDG&E was omitted from D.04-12-015.
5. SDG&E failed to meet its burden to produce clear and convincing evidence that there were any other omissions in D.04-12-015 that should be rectified on rehearing.
IT IS ORDERED that:
1. On rehearing of Decision (D.) 04-12-015, San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E) is authorized to recover an additional $5.4 million in test year 2004 expenses.
2. SDG&E is authorized to recover the additional revenue requirement for attrition year 2005.
3. SDG&E shall file an advice letter, with supporting work papers, to recover the under-collected revenue requirement for 2004 and 2005. The advice letter will be effective on the date filed subject to Energy Division determining that the filings are in compliance with this order.
4. Phase 3 of this proceeding is concluded.
5. Applications (A.) 02-12-027, A.02-12-028, and Investigation 03-03-016 are closed.
This order is effective today.
Dated __________________, at San Francisco, California.
