Comments on Draft Decision

The draft decision of Administrative Law Judge Joseph DeUlloa in this matter was mailed to the parties in accordance with Pub. Util. Code § 311(g) and Rule 77.7 of the Rules of Practice and Procedure. Comments were filed on ________, and reply comments were filed on __________.

Findings of Fact

1. The Petition for Rulemaking Proceeding (Petition) of Starline Tours of Hollywood, Inc. (Starline) proposes rules to address specific conduct by its competitors at a specific geographic location.

2. The Petition does not propose a rule of general applicability.

Conclusion of Law

1. Starline's allegations regarding conduct by its competitors that may constitute, e.g., false representations, trademark violations or illegal parking refer to conduct that is already prohibited. Starline may pursue relief through the Commission's complaint procedure, local police enforcement, or the courts.

2. Starline's Petition should be denied, effective immediately.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Petition for Rulemaking Proceeding of Starline Tours of Hollywood, Inc. is denied effective immediately.

2. Petition 00-02-018 is closed.

This order is effective today.

Dated , at San Francisco, California.

Previous PageTop Of PageGo To First PageNext Page