Need for Hearing

CSD questioned the need for a hearing because most, if not all, of the evidence consisted of criminal records certified by the superior court as authentic. Bell did not dispute this assertion.

Based on the record, we conclude that there are no disputed issues of material fact between these parties, and that a public hearing is not necessary. As no hearing is required, and pursuant to Rule 6.6 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (Rules), Article 2.5 of the Rules ceases to apply to this proceeding.