3. Timetable; Submission Date

The timetable for the critical path issues in this proceeding and the projected submission dates are set forth in the following schedules. I recognize that the time allotted for intervenors to review and analyze the proposed procurement plans before they file their testimony is limited. To facilitate that review and analysis, and to potentially mitigate discovery issues, I will direct that a data clarification workshop be convened at which each utility will explain the input assumptions and outputs of its proposed long term procurement plan, and answer data clarification questions.

Schedule A - Long-Term Procurement Plans

Event

Date

Long-term plans and supporting testimony

07/09/04

Workshop on plan clarification

07/16/04

Intervenor testimony

08/04/04

Rebuttal testimony

08/18/04

Cross-examination estimates

08/23/04

Prehearing conference - motions, schedule witnesses, etc.

08/25/04

Hearings begin

08/30/04

Hearings end

09/10/04

Concurrent opening briefs/requests for final oral argument

09/27/04

Concurrent reply briefs/submission

10/08/04

Proposed decision

11/16/04

Comments

12/06/04

Reply comments

12/13/04

Final Commission order on long-term procurement plans

12/16/04

Schedule B - Resource Adequacy Issues

Event

Date

Workshop report

06/__/04

Comments on workshop report (due 21 days after report)

07/__/04

Replies to comments/submission (due 14 days after comments)

07/__/04

Draft decision

08/24/04

Final Commission order on resource adequacy issues

09/23/04

The timetable for resolution of procurement incentives, expiring QF contracts, management audits, and any RAR issues not resolved pursuant to Schedule B will be determined at a later date. As already noted in the OIR, the Commission intends to resolve all matters in this proceeding within 18 months of the date of this scoping memo, consistent with Pub. Util. Code § 1701.5.

Previous PageTop Of PageNext PageGo To First Page