Word Document PDF Document |
ALJ/MCK/hkr DRAFT Agenda ID #3424
Adjudicatory
5/6/2004 Item 52
Decision DRAFT DECISION OF ALJ McKENZIE (Mailed 4/6/2004)
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Investigation into NOS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (U-5251-C), dba International Plus, 011 Communications, Internet Business Association (INETBA), I-Vantage Network Solutions; AFFINITY NETWORK, INC. (U-5229-C), dba QuantumLink Communications and HorizonOne Communications; and the corporate officers of NOS and ANI, to determine whether they have violated the laws, rules, and regulations governing the manner in which California subscribers are solicited, switched from one presubscribed carrier to another, and billed for telephone services. |
Investigation 02-05-001 (Filed May 2, 2002) |
In the Matter of the Application of Blue Ridge Telecom Systems, LLC for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to Provide Facilities-Based and Resold Local Exchange Services Within California. |
Application 01-12-013 (Filed December 10, 2001) |
FINAL OPINION APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page
FINAL OPINION APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 22
Terms of the Proposed Settlement 1010
Comments on Draft Decision 2424
ATTACHMENT A ALL PARTIES' SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
FINAL OPINION APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
In this decision, we approve with modifications a settlement agreement entered into between the Commission's Consumer Protection and Safety Division (CPSD) and certain of the respondents in this proceeding. The settlement agreement was filed on December 9, 2003, and is appended hereto as Attachment A.
Under the settlement agreement, the respondents will make payments to the Commission over a 24-month period totaling $2,950,000. Of this sum, $2,900,000 will be deposited into the State's General Fund, and $50,000 will be set aside for customer restitution. Each of about 1400 customers will receive a restitution payment of $25, and $7,825 of the $50,000 will be used to compensate the settlement claims administrator, Rosenthal & Company LLC (Rosenthal), that CPSD and the respondents have agreed will handle the actual notification of customers and payment of restitution.
The settlement agreement also requires that for a two-year period after approval of the settlement, respondents will abide by the "Call Unit Marketing and Sales Compliance Program" that is an integral part of the settlement and consent decree that respondents entered into with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in December 2002.1
Finally, CPSD has agreed to withdraw its protest of Application (A.) 01-12-013, in which Blue Ridge Telecom Systems, LLC (Blue Ridge)-a company controlled by the same individuals who control respondents NOS Communications, Inc. (NOS) and Affinity Network, Inc. (ANI)-seeks a certificate of public convenience and necessity (CPCN) to operate as a facilities-based reseller of local exchange services in California. CPSD has agreed to withdraw its protest of A.01-12-013 within 30 days after issuance of a Commission decision approving the settlement agreement, so that Blue Ridge's application can be "resolve[d] . . . as an unopposed application."
Applying the standards of Rule 51.1(e) of our Rules of Practice and Procedure (Rules), we find that with certain modifications, the settlement agreement is reasonable in light of the whole record, consistent with law, and in the public interest. We will therefore approve it, as modified.
1 NOS Communications, Inc. and Affinity Network Incorporated, Order, File No. EB-00-TC-005, 17 FCC Rcd 26853 (December 26, 2002). Hereinafter, this will be referred to as the "FCC TCU Consent Decree."