Notice of Availability - Resolution SX73
DRAFT General Order 75-D
Word Document PDF Document

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Consumer Protection and Safety Division

Rail Transit and Crossings Branch

Rail Crossings Engineering Section

    Resolution SX-73

    August 24, 2006

R E S O L U T I O N

RESOLUTION SX-73 ADOPTS COMMISSION GENERAL ORDER 75-D (REGULATIONS GOVERNING STANDARDS FOR WARNING DEVICES FOR AT-GRADE HIGHWAY-RAIL CROSSINGS IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA) TO SUPERSEDE AND REPLACE GENERAL ORDER 75-C

Summary

Commission General Order (GO) 75-C provides rules governing standards for warning devices for at-grade highway-rail crossings (at-grade crossings). This Resolution supersedes and replaces GO 75-C with GO 75-D due to necessary and substantial changes to GO 75-C.

Background

Intersections of highways with rail tracks are commonly referred to as highway-rail crossings. If the intersection is at the same elevation the crossing is referred to as at-grade. If the intersection is at different levels, that is, the highway and rail tracks cross over or under each other using a bridge structure, then the crossing is referred to as grade-separated.

Under the Public Utilities Code the Commission has the authority to establish rules regarding the installation and use of warning devices at at-grade crossings1.

The Rail Crossings Engineering Section (RCES), of the Commission's Consumer Protection & Safety Division, is responsible for implementing the Commission's safety oversight over highway-rail crossings. RCES initiated the process for adopting GO 75-D.

Discussion

RCES maintains a database of names and addresses of representatives of all rail agencies operating in California, cities and counties public works/traffic engineering staff, other state agencies (such as Caltrans), consultants, and other parties that have contacted RCES.

RCES sent a letter on October 21, 2005, and an email on October 26, 2005, to all organizations in its database that it proposes the adoption of GO 75-D, and asked if the organization wishes to be added to a special GO 75-D email list. The GO 75-D email list includes 175 individuals

On December 19, 2005, RCES posted on the Commission's website first draft of proposed GO 75-D and a memorandum describing the proposed changes between GO 75-C and GO 75-D. Interested parties were asked to submit written comments by January 27, 2006. RCES sent an email to individuals on its GO 75-D email list notifying them that the information described above was posted.

In January 2006, RCES met individually with representatives from light rail agencies, freight railroad companies, and commuter rail agencies to solicit comments from them on the first draft of proposed GO 75-D. RCES received written comments from 15 parties, in addition verbal comments received in meetings with six parties.

On February 24, 2006, RCES posted on the Commission's website a notice of two public participation workshops to solicit comments from interested parties. RCES sent an email to individuals on its GO 75-D email list notifying them of the workshops and that the information described above was posted on the Commission's web site.

Based on comments received, RCES revised the original draft GO 75-D. On March 13, 2006, RCES posted on the Commission's website the second draft of proposed GO 75-D, and sent an email to individuals on its GO 75-D email list notifying them that the information described above was posted.

On March 21 and 22, 2006, a two-day public participation workshop was held in the Commission's Los Angeles Hearing Room. The workshop participants included 20 individuals representing private consulting firms, freight railroad companies (including major transcontinental operators and local shortline operators), Caltrans, local cities and counties, light rail agencies, and commuter rail service operators.

On March 24, 2006, RCES posted on the Commission's website the first workshop meeting notes, and emailed to the workshop participants the meeting notes and list contact information of all participants.

On March 28, 2006, a one-day public participation workshop was held in the Commission's San Francisco headquarters. The workshop participants included 11 individuals representing private consulting firms, freight railroad companies, Caltrans, light rail agencies, and commuter train service operators.

On April 4, 2006 RCES posted on the Commission's website the second workshop meeting notes, and emailed to the first and second workshop participants the meeting notes of the second workshop and list contact information of all participants.

Based on comments received at both workshops, RCES once again revised the draft GO 75-D.

On April 12, 2006, RCES posted on the Commission's website the third draft of proposed GO 75-D, and provided a deadline of April 28, 2006 for final comments. RCES also sent an email to individuals on its GO 75-D email list notifying them that the information described above was posted. RCES received comments from four interested parties on the third draft of GO 75-D.

Based on comments received on the third draft, RCES prepared the fourth and final draft of GO 75-D which is included in Appendix A of this Resolution. RCES believes that it has reached consensus with the interested parties, and recommends the revised General Order be adopted by the Commission.

Comments and Draft Resolution

In accordance with Pub. Util. Code § 311(g)(1), on July 20, 2006 RCES posted on the Commission's website a draft copy of this Resolution and the final draft of GO 75-D. RCES sent an email, notifying that the information listed above is posted, to all individuals on its GO 75-D email list.

Findings

1. Public Utilities Code grants the Commission power to adopt rules regulating warning devices for at-grade highway-rail crossings.

2. GO 75-C governs the installation of warning devices for highway-rail at-grade crossings.

3. RCES solicited comments from interested parties on the proposed GO 75-D by holding two public participation workshops, posting notice of proposed changes on the Commission's website, and sending electronic mail notices to interested parties.

4. This Resolution, which includes the proposed GO 75-D as an attachment, was posted on the Commission's website on July 20, 2006, and xx comments were received.

5. Staff recommends that this Resolution be adopted.

Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that:

This Resolution becomes effective 30 days from today.

I certify that the Public Utilities Commission adopted this Resolution at its regular meeting on . The following Commissioners approved it:

APPENDIX A

PROPOSED GENERAL ORDER 75-D

Notice of Availability - Resolution SX73

DRAFT General Order 75-D

1 PU Code §768. The commission may, after a hearing, require every public utility to construct, maintain, and operate its line, ...tracks, and premises in a manner so as to promote and safeguard the health and safety of its employees, passengers, customers, and the public. The commission may prescribe, among other things, the installation, use, maintenance, and operation of appropriate safety or other devices or appliances, including interlocking and other protective devices at grade crossings or junctions and block or other systems of signaling. The commission may establish uniform or other standards of construction and equipment, and require the performance of any other act which the health or safety of its employees, passengers, customers, or the public may demand....

Top Of Page