KK2/lil 2/17/2012
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Application of Southern California Edison Company (U338E) for Approval of its 2012- 2014 California Alternate Rates for Energy (CARE) and Energy Savings Assistance Programs and Budgets. |
Application 11-05-017 (Filed May 16, 2011) |
And Related Matters. |
Application 11-05-018 Application 11-05-019 Application 11-05-020 |
CORRECTED ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE'S RULING
ADMITTING DATA REQUESTS AND RESPONSES INTO THE RECORD
This corrected ruling corrects, supersedes and replaces my ruling issued on February 16, 2012 titled "ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE'S RULING ADMITTING DATA REQUESTS AND RESPONSES INTO THE RECORD." Only correction in this corrected ruling is it includes copies of Exhibits 31 and 32, which were supposed to have been appended in that prior ruling. All other aspects of that prior ruling remains unchanged and set forth below.
This ruling admits the attached, identified and marked data requests into the record of the above captioned consolidated proceeding (Consolidated Proceeding), as exhibits into the proceeding record, subject to motions to strike and/or other objections.
On January 10, 2012, The National Consumer Law Center ("NCLC"), California Housing Partnership Corporation ("CHPC"), and National Housing Law Project (collectively, "Moving Parties") filed a motion seeking to admit the following data requests as well as responses thereto into evidence and record of the Consolidated Proceeding (Motion) and attached and identified as Exhibit 311 are the referenced documents listed below:
● NCLC requests to San Diego Gas & Electric, ## 3-1 & 3-2
● NCLC requests to Southern California Gas, # 3-1
● NCLC requests to Southern California Edison:
Set 1, ## 1-2, 1-7, 1-8, 1-9, 1-12, 1-14, 1-15
Set 2, ## 2-1, 2-4
Set 3, ## 3-1, 3-2
● NCLC requests to Pacific Gas & Electric:
Set 1, ## 1-2, 1-3, 1-7, 1-8, 1-9, 1-10, 1-16, 1-19, 1-20
Set 2, ## 2-2, 2-3, 2-4
Set 3, ## 3-1, 3-2
● Southern California Gas requests to NCLC, ## 6, 7, 8, 9
● The East Los Angeles Community Union et al. requests to CHPC, ## 1-1 through 1-19, inclusive.
● CHPC requests to San Diego Gas & Electric, ## 1-3, 1-5, 1-7, 1-12, 1-14 & 1-16
● CHPC requests to Pacific Gas & Electric, ## 1-2, 1-7, & 1-10.
On December 28, 2011, the moving parties gave all parties in this proceeding a notice of their intent to file the Motion and no objections have since been received in response to the Motion.
On February 13, 2012, I also received from the Commission's Energy Division (ED), the Commission's advisory staff group, the following data requests as well as responses thereto to better inform the record on the issues set forth therein. ED seeks to admit them into evidence and record of the Consolidated Proceeding (ED Request) and attached and identified as Exhibit 322 are the referenced documents listed below:
● SCE Cool Centers - Associated Costs by Category 2012-14
● SCE data request 6
● SDG& E data request 3
● SDG& E data request 6
● PGE data requests 3 & 6
Therefore IT IS RULED that:
1. This corrected ruling corrects, supersedes and replaces my ruling issued on February 16, 2012 titled "ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE'S RULING ADMITTING DATA REQUESTS AND RESPONSES INTO THE RECORD."
2. The moving parties' data requests and corresponding responses are collectively identified and marked as Exhibit 31 and received into the record of this Consolidated Proceeding.
3. The data requests and corresponding responses offered through ED Request are collectively identified and marked as Exhibit 32 and received into the record of this Consolidated Proceeding.
4. Any motion to strike must be filed within 10 days of this ruling. A party objecting and seeking to strike any portion of those exhibits ruled in by this ruling must first meet and confer and in good faith to try to reach an informal resolution before filing a motion to strike.
5. As envisioned by January 26, 2012 Amended Scoping Memo Ruling, the submission date and close of record for all issues within the scope of this Consolidated Proceeding, with the exception of (1) pending pilot review, and (2) issues of cost effectiveness methodology, multifamily sector, remains February 16, 2012. However, for any timely filed motion, if there are any, responsive to the exhibits, I will allow reopening of the record on the closed issues solely to entertain such motion(s).
Dated February 17, 2012, at San Francisco, California.
/s/ KATHERINE MACDONALD for | ||
Kimberly H. Kim Administrative Law Judge |
1 Attached is a copy and the original Exhibit 31 is on file with the Commission's Central File.
2 Attached is a copy and the original Exhibit 32 is on file with the Commission's Central File.
